What is your answer?
According to Kant's theory of pure physics,
{ 1 } - There are no principles of science that are not empirical.
{ 2 } - Hume is correct in explaining uniformity of experience psychologically and subjectively, due to custom and habit.
{ 3 } - in order for an object to be an object, it must be related to the unity of apperception by being determined by a priori forms and categories.
{ 4 } - nature would exist for us without the forms of sensibility and the categories of the understanding.
{ 5 } - Newtonian physics proves the uniformity of experience.
<= back | menu | forward =>
Directions: Click on a number from 1 to 5.
1 is wrong. Please try again.
According to Kant's theory of pure physics,
{ 1 } - There are no principles of science that are not empirical.
{ 2 } - Hume is correct in explaining uniformity of experience psychologically and subjectively, due to custom and habit.
{ 3 } - in order for an object to be an object, it must be related to the unity of apperception by being determined by a priori forms and categories.
{ 4 } - nature would exist for us without the forms of sensibility and the categories of the understanding.
{ 5 } - Newtonian physics proves the uniformity of experience.
No, that contradicts what he holds, and even the empiricist Russell admits there are postulates of science that are not empirical.
<= back | menu | forward =>
2 is wrong. Please try again.
According to Kant's theory of pure physics,
{ 1 } - There are no principles of science that are not empirical.
{ 2 } - Hume is correct in explaining uniformity of experience psychologically and subjectively, due to custom and habit.
{ 3 } - in order for an object to be an object, it must be related to the unity of apperception by being determined by a priori forms and categories.
{ 4 } - nature would exist for us without the forms of sensibility and the categories of the understanding.
{ 5 } - Newtonian physics proves the uniformity of experience.
No, Kant explains the uniformity through conditions of objective experience. See p. 265.
<= back | menu | forward =>
3 is correct!
According to Kant's theory of pure physics,
{ 1 } - There are no principles of science that are not empirical.
{ 2 } - Hume is correct in explaining uniformity of experience psychologically and subjectively, due to custom and habit.
{ 3 } - in order for an object to be an object, it must be related to the unity of apperception by being determined by a priori forms and categories.
{ 4 } - nature would exist for us without the forms of sensibility and the categories of the understanding.
{ 5 } - Newtonian physics proves the uniformity of experience.
See p. 265.
<= back | menu | forward =>
Before continuing, you might try some wrong answers.
4 is wrong. Please try again.
According to Kant's theory of pure physics,
{ 1 } - There are no principles of science that are not empirical.
{ 2 } - Hume is correct in explaining uniformity of experience psychologically and subjectively, due to custom and habit.
{ 3 } - in order for an object to be an object, it must be related to the unity of apperception by being determined by a priori forms and categories.
{ 4 } - nature would exist for us without the forms of sensibility and the categories of the understanding.
{ 5 } - Newtonian physics proves the uniformity of experience.
No, he thinks that the laws of these forms and categories determine our experience of nature. See p. 265.
<= back | menu | forward =>
5 is wrong. Please try again.
According to Kant's theory of pure physics,
{ 1 } - There are no principles of science that are not empirical.
{ 2 } - Hume is correct in explaining uniformity of experience psychologically and subjectively, due to custom and habit.
{ 3 } - in order for an object to be an object, it must be related to the unity of apperception by being determined by a priori forms and categories.
{ 4 } - nature would exist for us without the forms of sensibility and the categories of the understanding.
{ 5 } - Newtonian physics proves the uniformity of experience.
No, Newtonian physics presumes the uniformity of experience, which is due to principles such as the law of causality and the permanence of substance in change. See p. 265.
<= back | menu | forward =>
the end