What is your answer?
Kant's objection to the ontological argument does not involve:
{ 1 } - Reducing the cosmological argument to the ontological argument.
{ 2 } - Saying that the concept which is adequate to an absolutely necessary being is a most real being,
{ 3 } - Saying that the awareness of God implies His existence.
{ 4 } - Saying that "every absolutely necessary being is an all-perfect being" is equivalent to the ontological argument.
{ 5 } - Saying that some absolutely necessary being is an all-perfect being.
<= back | menu | forward =>
Directions: Click on a number from 1 to 5.
1 is wrong. Please try again.
Kant's objection to the ontological argument does not involve:
{ 1 } - Reducing the cosmological argument to the ontological argument.
{ 2 } - Saying that the concept which is adequate to an absolutely necessary being is a most real being,
{ 3 } - Saying that the awareness of God implies His existence.
{ 4 } - Saying that "every absolutely necessary being is an all-perfect being" is equivalent to the ontological argument.
{ 5 } - Saying that some absolutely necessary being is an all-perfect being.
<= back | menu | forward =>
2 is wrong. Please try again.
Kant's objection to the ontological argument does not involve:
{ 1 } - Reducing the cosmological argument to the ontological argument.
{ 2 } - Saying that the concept which is adequate to an absolutely necessary being is a most real being,
{ 3 } - Saying that the awareness of God implies His existence.
{ 4 } - Saying that "every absolutely necessary being is an all-perfect being" is equivalent to the ontological argument.
{ 5 } - Saying that some absolutely necessary being is an all-perfect being.
<= back | menu | forward =>
3 is correct!
Kant's objection to the ontological argument does not involve:
{ 1 } - Reducing the cosmological argument to the ontological argument.
{ 2 } - Saying that the concept which is adequate to an absolutely necessary being is a most real being,
{ 3 } - Saying that the awareness of God implies His existence.
{ 4 } - Saying that "every absolutely necessary being is an all-perfect being" is equivalent to the ontological argument.
{ 5 } - Saying that some absolutely necessary being is an all-perfect being.
<= back | menu | forward =>
Before continuing, you might try some wrong answers.
4 is wrong. Please try again.
Kant's objection to the ontological argument does not involve:
{ 1 } - Reducing the cosmological argument to the ontological argument.
{ 2 } - Saying that the concept which is adequate to an absolutely necessary being is a most real being,
{ 3 } - Saying that the awareness of God implies His existence.
{ 4 } - Saying that "every absolutely necessary being is an all-perfect being" is equivalent to the ontological argument.
{ 5 } - Saying that some absolutely necessary being is an all-perfect being.
<= back | menu | forward =>
5 is wrong. Please try again.
Kant's objection to the ontological argument does not involve:
{ 1 } - Reducing the cosmological argument to the ontological argument.
{ 2 } - Saying that the concept which is adequate to an absolutely necessary being is a most real being,
{ 3 } - Saying that the awareness of God implies His existence.
{ 4 } - Saying that "every absolutely necessary being is an all-perfect being" is equivalent to the ontological argument.
{ 5 } - Saying that some absolutely necessary being is an all-perfect being.
<= back | menu | forward =>
the end