What is your answer?
According to Kant, the following is NOT one of the possible fallacious ways of proving God's existence:
{ 1 } - Proceeding from apparent purpose or finality in the world to God as the cause of the finality.
{ 2 } - Proceeding from empirical existence to God as the cause of the existence.
{ 3 } - Proceeding from the idea of God to the existence of God.
{ 4 } - The ontological argument.
{ 5 } - Applying the category of existence to one's sensation.
<= back | menu | forward =>
Directions: Click on a number from 1 to 5.
1 is wrong. Please try again.
According to Kant, the following is NOT one of the possible fallacious ways of proving God's existence:
{ 1 } - Proceeding from apparent purpose or finality in the world to God as the cause of the finality.
{ 2 } - Proceeding from empirical existence to God as the cause of the existence.
{ 3 } - Proceeding from the idea of God to the existence of God.
{ 4 } - The ontological argument.
{ 5 } - Applying the category of existence to one's sensation.
<= back | menu | forward =>
2 is wrong. Please try again.
According to Kant, the following is NOT one of the possible fallacious ways of proving God's existence:
{ 1 } - Proceeding from apparent purpose or finality in the world to God as the cause of the finality.
{ 2 } - Proceeding from empirical existence to God as the cause of the existence.
{ 3 } - Proceeding from the idea of God to the existence of God.
{ 4 } - The ontological argument.
{ 5 } - Applying the category of existence to one's sensation.
<= back | menu | forward =>
3 is wrong. Please try again.
According to Kant, the following is NOT one of the possible fallacious ways of proving God's existence:
{ 1 } - Proceeding from apparent purpose or finality in the world to God as the cause of the finality.
{ 2 } - Proceeding from empirical existence to God as the cause of the existence.
{ 3 } - Proceeding from the idea of God to the existence of God.
{ 4 } - The ontological argument.
{ 5 } - Applying the category of existence to one's sensation.
<= back | menu | forward =>
4 is wrong. Please try again.
According to Kant, the following is NOT one of the possible fallacious ways of proving God's existence:
{ 1 } - Proceeding from apparent purpose or finality in the world to God as the cause of the finality.
{ 2 } - Proceeding from empirical existence to God as the cause of the existence.
{ 3 } - Proceeding from the idea of God to the existence of God.
{ 4 } - The ontological argument.
{ 5 } - Applying the category of existence to one's sensation.
<= back | menu | forward =>
5 is correct!
According to Kant, the following is NOT one of the possible fallacious ways of proving God's existence:
{ 1 } - Proceeding from apparent purpose or finality in the world to God as the cause of the finality.
{ 2 } - Proceeding from empirical existence to God as the cause of the existence.
{ 3 } - Proceeding from the idea of God to the existence of God.
{ 4 } - The ontological argument.
{ 5 } - Applying the category of existence to one's sensation.
<= back | menu | forward =>
Before continuing, you might try some wrong answers.
the end