What is your answer?
Which position does Kant NOT hold concerning practical faith?
{ 1 } - "Faith (as habit, not as act) is the moral way of thinking of Reason as to belief in that which is unattainable by theoretical knowledge."
{ 2 } - Faith is a commitment, a trust in one's immediate hearing of God speaking, and is thus the highest kind of knowledge, which is union of one's consciousness with a reality other than oneself.
{ 3 } - To have theoretical knowledge of God we should have to employ the categories of the understanding.
{ 4 } - Kant does not intend to say that moral faith is irrational.
{ 5 } - Practical faith is free in that the mind cannot be compelled to assent to it by any theoretical proof.
{ 6 } - The categories of the understanding can be used to think God analogically or symbolically, but cannot give us knowledge of Him.
{ 7 } - Categories of the understanding give knowledge of objects only as they are constitutive principles of experience, but God is not a possible object of experience.
<= back | menu | forward =>
Directions: Click on a number from 1 to 7.
1 is wrong. Please try again.
Which position does Kant NOT hold concerning practical faith?
{ 1 } - "Faith (as habit, not as act) is the moral way of thinking of Reason as to belief in that which is unattainable by theoretical knowledge."
{ 2 } - Faith is a commitment, a trust in one's immediate hearing of God speaking, and is thus the highest kind of knowledge, which is union of one's consciousness with a reality other than oneself.
{ 3 } - To have theoretical knowledge of God we should have to employ the categories of the understanding.
{ 4 } - Kant does not intend to say that moral faith is irrational.
{ 5 } - Practical faith is free in that the mind cannot be compelled to assent to it by any theoretical proof.
{ 6 } - The categories of the understanding can be used to think God analogically or symbolically, but cannot give us knowledge of Him.
{ 7 } - Categories of the understanding give knowledge of objects only as they are constitutive principles of experience, but God is not a possible object of experience.
See p. 379.
<= back | menu | forward =>
2 is correct!
Which position does Kant NOT hold concerning practical faith?
{ 1 } - "Faith (as habit, not as act) is the moral way of thinking of Reason as to belief in that which is unattainable by theoretical knowledge."
{ 2 } - Faith is a commitment, a trust in one's immediate hearing of God speaking, and is thus the highest kind of knowledge, which is union of one's consciousness with a reality other than oneself.
{ 3 } - To have theoretical knowledge of God we should have to employ the categories of the understanding.
{ 4 } - Kant does not intend to say that moral faith is irrational.
{ 5 } - Practical faith is free in that the mind cannot be compelled to assent to it by any theoretical proof.
{ 6 } - The categories of the understanding can be used to think God analogically or symbolically, but cannot give us knowledge of Him.
{ 7 } - Categories of the understanding give knowledge of objects only as they are constitutive principles of experience, but God is not a possible object of experience.
Is this the position of the ontological argument?
<= back | menu | forward =>
Before continuing, you might try some wrong answers.
3 is wrong. Please try again.
Which position does Kant NOT hold concerning practical faith?
{ 1 } - "Faith (as habit, not as act) is the moral way of thinking of Reason as to belief in that which is unattainable by theoretical knowledge."
{ 2 } - Faith is a commitment, a trust in one's immediate hearing of God speaking, and is thus the highest kind of knowledge, which is union of one's consciousness with a reality other than oneself.
{ 3 } - To have theoretical knowledge of God we should have to employ the categories of the understanding.
{ 4 } - Kant does not intend to say that moral faith is irrational.
{ 5 } - Practical faith is free in that the mind cannot be compelled to assent to it by any theoretical proof.
{ 6 } - The categories of the understanding can be used to think God analogically or symbolically, but cannot give us knowledge of Him.
{ 7 } - Categories of the understanding give knowledge of objects only as they are constitutive principles of experience, but God is not a possible object of experience.
See p. 379.
<= back | menu | forward =>
4 is wrong. Please try again.
Which position does Kant NOT hold concerning practical faith?
{ 1 } - "Faith (as habit, not as act) is the moral way of thinking of Reason as to belief in that which is unattainable by theoretical knowledge."
{ 2 } - Faith is a commitment, a trust in one's immediate hearing of God speaking, and is thus the highest kind of knowledge, which is union of one's consciousness with a reality other than oneself.
{ 3 } - To have theoretical knowledge of God we should have to employ the categories of the understanding.
{ 4 } - Kant does not intend to say that moral faith is irrational.
{ 5 } - Practical faith is free in that the mind cannot be compelled to assent to it by any theoretical proof.
{ 6 } - The categories of the understanding can be used to think God analogically or symbolically, but cannot give us knowledge of Him.
{ 7 } - Categories of the understanding give knowledge of objects only as they are constitutive principles of experience, but God is not a possible object of experience.
See p. 379.
<= back | menu | forward =>
5 is wrong. Please try again.
Which position does Kant NOT hold concerning practical faith?
{ 1 } - "Faith (as habit, not as act) is the moral way of thinking of Reason as to belief in that which is unattainable by theoretical knowledge."
{ 2 } - Faith is a commitment, a trust in one's immediate hearing of God speaking, and is thus the highest kind of knowledge, which is union of one's consciousness with a reality other than oneself.
{ 3 } - To have theoretical knowledge of God we should have to employ the categories of the understanding.
{ 4 } - Kant does not intend to say that moral faith is irrational.
{ 5 } - Practical faith is free in that the mind cannot be compelled to assent to it by any theoretical proof.
{ 6 } - The categories of the understanding can be used to think God analogically or symbolically, but cannot give us knowledge of Him.
{ 7 } - Categories of the understanding give knowledge of objects only as they are constitutive principles of experience, but God is not a possible object of experience.
See p. 379.
<= back | menu | forward =>
6 is wrong. Please try again.
Which position does Kant NOT hold concerning practical faith?
{ 1 } - "Faith (as habit, not as act) is the moral way of thinking of Reason as to belief in that which is unattainable by theoretical knowledge."
{ 2 } - Faith is a commitment, a trust in one's immediate hearing of God speaking, and is thus the highest kind of knowledge, which is union of one's consciousness with a reality other than oneself.
{ 3 } - To have theoretical knowledge of God we should have to employ the categories of the understanding.
{ 4 } - Kant does not intend to say that moral faith is irrational.
{ 5 } - Practical faith is free in that the mind cannot be compelled to assent to it by any theoretical proof.
{ 6 } - The categories of the understanding can be used to think God analogically or symbolically, but cannot give us knowledge of Him.
{ 7 } - Categories of the understanding give knowledge of objects only as they are constitutive principles of experience, but God is not a possible object of experience.
See p. 379.
<= back | menu | forward =>
7 is wrong. Please try again.
Which position does Kant NOT hold concerning practical faith?
{ 1 } - "Faith (as habit, not as act) is the moral way of thinking of Reason as to belief in that which is unattainable by theoretical knowledge."
{ 2 } - Faith is a commitment, a trust in one's immediate hearing of God speaking, and is thus the highest kind of knowledge, which is union of one's consciousness with a reality other than oneself.
{ 3 } - To have theoretical knowledge of God we should have to employ the categories of the understanding.
{ 4 } - Kant does not intend to say that moral faith is irrational.
{ 5 } - Practical faith is free in that the mind cannot be compelled to assent to it by any theoretical proof.
{ 6 } - The categories of the understanding can be used to think God analogically or symbolically, but cannot give us knowledge of Him.
{ 7 } - Categories of the understanding give knowledge of objects only as they are constitutive principles of experience, but God is not a possible object of experience.
See p. 379.
<= back | menu | forward =>
the end