What is your answer?

Kant does not think that

    { 1 } - through the concept of the purposiveness of Nature, Nature is represented as though an intelligencce contained the ground of the manifold of Nature's empirical laws.
    { 2 } - the principle of the purposiveness of Nature rests on empirical observations.
    { 3 } - the purposiveness of Nature is a special a priori concept which has its ultimate source in the fraculty of reflective judgment.
    { 4 } - the concept of Nature as unified through the common ground of its laws in a superhuman intelligence or mind which adapts the system to our cognitive faculties is the concept of the purposiveness or finality of Nature.
    { 5 } - the principle of the purposiveness of Nature is a transcendental principle of the faculty or power of judgment.

<= back | menu | forward =>
Directions: Click on a number from 1 to 5.
























 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

























1 is wrong. Please try again.

Kant does not think that

See p. 352

<= back | menu | forward =>
























 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

























2 is correct!

Kant does not think that

    { 1 } - through the concept of the purposiveness of Nature, Nature is represented as though an intelligencce contained the ground of the manifold of Nature's empirical laws.
    { 2 } - the principle of the purposiveness of Nature rests on empirical observations.
    { 3 } - the purposiveness of Nature is a special a priori concept which has its ultimate source in the fraculty of reflective judgment.
    { 4 } - the concept of Nature as unified through the common ground of its laws in a superhuman intelligence or mind which adapts the system to our cognitive faculties is the concept of the purposiveness or finality of Nature.
    { 5 } - the principle of the purposiveness of Nature is a transcendental principle of the faculty or power of judgment.

It is a priori.

<= back | menu | forward =>
Before continuing, you might try some wrong answers.
























 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

























3 is wrong. Please try again.

Kant does not think that

    { 1 } - through the concept of the purposiveness of Nature, Nature is represented as though an intelligencce contained the ground of the manifold of Nature's empirical laws.
    { 2 } - the principle of the purposiveness of Nature rests on empirical observations.
    { 3 } - the purposiveness of Nature is a special a priori concept which has its ultimate source in the fraculty of reflective judgment.
    { 4 } - the concept of Nature as unified through the common ground of its laws in a superhuman intelligence or mind which adapts the system to our cognitive faculties is the concept of the purposiveness or finality of Nature.
    { 5 } - the principle of the purposiveness of Nature is a transcendental principle of the faculty or power of judgment.

See p. 352

<= back | menu | forward =>
























 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

























4 is wrong. Please try again.

Kant does not think that

    { 1 } - through the concept of the purposiveness of Nature, Nature is represented as though an intelligencce contained the ground of the manifold of Nature's empirical laws.
    { 2 } - the principle of the purposiveness of Nature rests on empirical observations.
    { 3 } - the purposiveness of Nature is a special a priori concept which has its ultimate source in the fraculty of reflective judgment.
    { 4 } - the concept of Nature as unified through the common ground of its laws in a superhuman intelligence or mind which adapts the system to our cognitive faculties is the concept of the purposiveness or finality of Nature.
    { 5 } - the principle of the purposiveness of Nature is a transcendental principle of the faculty or power of judgment.

See p. 352

<= back | menu | forward =>
























 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

























5 is wrong. Please try again.

Kant does not think that

    { 1 } - through the concept of the purposiveness of Nature, Nature is represented as though an intelligencce contained the ground of the manifold of Nature's empirical laws.
    { 2 } - the principle of the purposiveness of Nature rests on empirical observations.
    { 3 } - the purposiveness of Nature is a special a priori concept which has its ultimate source in the fraculty of reflective judgment.
    { 4 } - the concept of Nature as unified through the common ground of its laws in a superhuman intelligence or mind which adapts the system to our cognitive faculties is the concept of the purposiveness or finality of Nature.
    { 5 } - the principle of the purposiveness of Nature is a transcendental principle of the faculty or power of judgment.

See p. 352

<= back | menu | forward =>
























 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

























the end