What is your answer?
Kant agrees with Locke and Hume that
{ 1 } - causality is derived from sense experience.
{ 2 } - all our knowledge is derived from sense experience.
{ 3 } - concepts such as causality are "pure."
{ 4 } - causality is "a priori" (from before) experience.
{ 5 } - Sense experience is necessary for knowledge.
<= back | menu | forward =>
Directions: Click on a number from 1 to 5.
1 is wrong. Please try again.
Kant agrees with Locke and Hume that
{ 1 } - causality is derived from sense experience.
{ 2 } - all our knowledge is derived from sense experience.
{ 3 } - concepts such as causality are "pure."
{ 4 } - causality is "a priori" (from before) experience.
{ 5 } - Sense experience is necessary for knowledge.
Hume thinks this, but Kant thinks causality is a concept that comes from reason.
<= back | menu | forward =>
2 is wrong. Please try again.
Kant agrees with Locke and Hume that
{ 1 } - causality is derived from sense experience.
{ 2 } - all our knowledge is derived from sense experience.
{ 3 } - concepts such as causality are "pure."
{ 4 } - causality is "a priori" (from before) experience.
{ 5 } - Sense experience is necessary for knowledge.
No, he thinks knowledge requires concepts, which are not derived from sense experience.
<= back | menu | forward =>
3 is wrong. Please try again.
Kant agrees with Locke and Hume that
{ 1 } - causality is derived from sense experience.
{ 2 } - all our knowledge is derived from sense experience.
{ 3 } - concepts such as causality are "pure."
{ 4 } - causality is "a priori" (from before) experience.
{ 5 } - Sense experience is necessary for knowledge.
"Pure" for Kant means without sense experience, and Hume does not believe that one has conepts like causality without sense experience.
<= back | menu | forward =>
4 is wrong. Please try again.
Kant agrees with Locke and Hume that
{ 1 } - causality is derived from sense experience.
{ 2 } - all our knowledge is derived from sense experience.
{ 3 } - concepts such as causality are "pure."
{ 4 } - causality is "a priori" (from before) experience.
{ 5 } - Sense experience is necessary for knowledge.
Kant thinks this, but Hume does not. See p. 213.
<= back | menu | forward =>
5 is correct!
Kant agrees with Locke and Hume that
{ 1 } - causality is derived from sense experience.
{ 2 } - all our knowledge is derived from sense experience.
{ 3 } - concepts such as causality are "pure."
{ 4 } - causality is "a priori" (from before) experience.
{ 5 } - Sense experience is necessary for knowledge.
Knowledge for Kant requires the matter of sensation as well as concepts, the forms of the mind.
<= back | menu | forward =>
Before continuing, you might try some wrong answers.
the end