What is your answer?
For Kant,
{ 1 } - his criticism of metaphysics in the Transcendental Dialectic destroys practical or moral faith.
{ 2 } - pure reason in the Critique of Pure Reason means pure practical reason.
{ 3 } - the Critique of Pure Reason stands by itself.
{ 4 } - reality is restricted to what natural science can know.
{ 5 } - sensible and intelligible reality are separated, and man can be determined and free at the same time under different aspects.
{ 6 } - we can have theoretical knowledge of realities that are not given or capable of being given in sense experience (God, world as totality, soul.)
<= back | menu | forward =>
Directions: Click on a number from 1 to 6.
1 is wrong. Please try again.
For Kant,
{ 1 } - his criticism of metaphysics in the Transcendental Dialectic destroys practical or moral faith.
{ 2 } - pure reason in the Critique of Pure Reason means pure practical reason.
{ 3 } - the Critique of Pure Reason stands by itself.
{ 4 } - reality is restricted to what natural science can know.
{ 5 } - sensible and intelligible reality are separated, and man can be determined and free at the same time under different aspects.
{ 6 } - we can have theoretical knowledge of realities that are not given or capable of being given in sense experience (God, world as totality, soul.)
No, he says that he has to do away with knowledge to make room for faith. See p. 232.
<= back | menu | forward =>
2 is wrong. Please try again.
For Kant,
{ 1 } - his criticism of metaphysics in the Transcendental Dialectic destroys practical or moral faith.
{ 2 } - pure reason in the Critique of Pure Reason means pure practical reason.
{ 3 } - the Critique of Pure Reason stands by itself.
{ 4 } - reality is restricted to what natural science can know.
{ 5 } - sensible and intelligible reality are separated, and man can be determined and free at the same time under different aspects.
{ 6 } - we can have theoretical knowledge of realities that are not given or capable of being given in sense experience (God, world as totality, soul.)
No, it means pure theoretical reason.
<= back | menu | forward =>
3 is wrong. Please try again.
For Kant,
{ 1 } - his criticism of metaphysics in the Transcendental Dialectic destroys practical or moral faith.
{ 2 } - pure reason in the Critique of Pure Reason means pure practical reason.
{ 3 } - the Critique of Pure Reason stands by itself.
{ 4 } - reality is restricted to what natural science can know.
{ 5 } - sensible and intelligible reality are separated, and man can be determined and free at the same time under different aspects.
{ 6 } - we can have theoretical knowledge of realities that are not given or capable of being given in sense experience (God, world as totality, soul.)
No, it is part of a total philosophy revealed in successive works.
<= back | menu | forward =>
4 is wrong. Please try again.
For Kant,
{ 1 } - his criticism of metaphysics in the Transcendental Dialectic destroys practical or moral faith.
{ 2 } - pure reason in the Critique of Pure Reason means pure practical reason.
{ 3 } - the Critique of Pure Reason stands by itself.
{ 4 } - reality is restricted to what natural science can know.
{ 5 } - sensible and intelligible reality are separated, and man can be determined and free at the same time under different aspects.
{ 6 } - we can have theoretical knowledge of realities that are not given or capable of being given in sense experience (God, world as totality, soul.)
No, our moral consciousness involves the idea of freedom, which natural science does not admit.
<= back | menu | forward =>
5 is correct!
For Kant,
{ 1 } - his criticism of metaphysics in the Transcendental Dialectic destroys practical or moral faith.
{ 2 } - pure reason in the Critique of Pure Reason means pure practical reason.
{ 3 } - the Critique of Pure Reason stands by itself.
{ 4 } - reality is restricted to what natural science can know.
{ 5 } - sensible and intelligible reality are separated, and man can be determined and free at the same time under different aspects.
{ 6 } - we can have theoretical knowledge of realities that are not given or capable of being given in sense experience (God, world as totality, soul.)
<= back | menu | forward =>
Before continuing, you might try some wrong answers.
6 is wrong. Please try again.
For Kant,
{ 1 } - his criticism of metaphysics in the Transcendental Dialectic destroys practical or moral faith.
{ 2 } - pure reason in the Critique of Pure Reason means pure practical reason.
{ 3 } - the Critique of Pure Reason stands by itself.
{ 4 } - reality is restricted to what natural science can know.
{ 5 } - sensible and intelligible reality are separated, and man can be determined and free at the same time under different aspects.
{ 6 } - we can have theoretical knowledge of realities that are not given or capable of being given in sense experience (God, world as totality, soul.)
No, sense experience is a necessary element of theoretical knowledge for Kant.
<= back | menu | forward =>
the end