What is your answer?
According to Thomas Aquinas, circumstances and circumstantial intentions
{ 1 } - can make an essentially evil act essentially good.
{ 2 } - do not accidentally qualify the moral act.
{ 3 } - can make an essentially good act evil.
{ 4 } - essentially specify the moral act.
<= back | menu | forward =>
Directions: Click on a number from 1 to 4.
1 is wrong. Please try again.
According to Thomas Aquinas, circumstances and circumstantial intentions
{ 1 } - can make an essentially evil act essentially good.
{ 2 } - do not accidentally qualify the moral act.
{ 3 } - can make an essentially good act evil.
{ 4 } - essentially specify the moral act.
No, they cannot. See p. 162.
<= back | menu | forward =>
2 is wrong. Please try again.
According to Thomas Aquinas, circumstances and circumstantial intentions
{ 1 } - can make an essentially evil act essentially good.
{ 2 } - do not accidentally qualify the moral act.
{ 3 } - can make an essentially good act evil.
{ 4 } - essentially specify the moral act.
See p. 162.
<= back | menu | forward =>
3 is correct!
According to Thomas Aquinas, circumstances and circumstantial intentions
{ 1 } - can make an essentially evil act essentially good.
{ 2 } - do not accidentally qualify the moral act.
{ 3 } - can make an essentially good act evil.
{ 4 } - essentially specify the moral act.
See p. 162.
<= back | menu | forward =>
Before continuing, you might try some wrong answers.
4 is wrong. Please try again.
According to Thomas Aquinas, circumstances and circumstantial intentions
{ 1 } - can make an essentially evil act essentially good.
{ 2 } - do not accidentally qualify the moral act.
{ 3 } - can make an essentially good act evil.
{ 4 } - essentially specify the moral act.
No, the moral object essentially specifies the moral act. See p. 162.
<= back | menu | forward =>
the end