What is the best match?

If anything exists, an absolutely necessary being exists.

    { 1 } - ontological argument
    { 2 } - third transcendental Idea of pure reason
    { 3 } - cosmological argument
    { 4 } - physico-theological argument

<= back | menu | forward =>
Directions: Click on a number from 1 to 4.
























 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

























1 is wrong. Please try again.

If anything exists, an absolutely necessary being exists.

I cannot admit the possibility of an Ens Realissimum and deny its existence <=> ontological argument

<= back | menu | forward =>
























 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

























2 is wrong. Please try again.

If anything exists, an absolutely necessary being exists.

    { 1 } - ontological argument
    { 2 } - third transcendental Idea of pure reason
    { 3 } - cosmological argument
    { 4 } - physico-theological argument

idea of God <=> third transcendental Idea of pure reason

<= back | menu | forward =>
























 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

























3 is correct!

If anything exists, an absolutely necessary being exists.

    { 1 } - ontological argument
    { 2 } - third transcendental Idea of pure reason
    { 3 } - cosmological argument
    { 4 } - physico-theological argument

If anything exists, an absolutely necessary being exists. <=> cosmological argument

<= back | menu | forward =>
Before continuing, you might try some wrong answers.
























 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

























4 is wrong. Please try again.

If anything exists, an absolutely necessary being exists.

    { 1 } - ontological argument
    { 2 } - third transcendental Idea of pure reason
    { 3 } - cosmological argument
    { 4 } - physico-theological argument

Adaptation of means to end does not belong to the nature of things. <=> physico-theological argument

<= back | menu | forward =>
























 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

























the end