What is the best match?
Adaptation of means to end does not belong to the nature of things.
{ 1 } - ontological argument
{ 2 } - third transcendental Idea of pure reason
{ 3 } - physico-theological argument
{ 4 } - cosmological argument
<= back | menu | forward =>
Directions: Click on a number from 1 to 4.
1 is wrong. Please try again.
Adaptation of means to end does not belong to the nature of things.
{ 1 } - ontological argument
{ 2 } - third transcendental Idea of pure reason
{ 3 } - physico-theological argument
{ 4 } - cosmological argument
I cannot admit the possibility of an Ens Realissimum and deny its existence <=> ontological argument
<= back | menu | forward =>
2 is wrong. Please try again.
Adaptation of means to end does not belong to the nature of things.
{ 1 } - ontological argument
{ 2 } - third transcendental Idea of pure reason
{ 3 } - physico-theological argument
{ 4 } - cosmological argument
idea of God <=> third transcendental Idea of pure reason
<= back | menu | forward =>
3 is correct!
Adaptation of means to end does not belong to the nature of things.
{ 1 } - ontological argument
{ 2 } - third transcendental Idea of pure reason
{ 3 } - physico-theological argument
{ 4 } - cosmological argument
Adaptation of means to end does not belong to the nature of things. <=> physico-theological argument
<= back | menu | forward =>
Before continuing, you might try some wrong answers.
4 is wrong. Please try again.
Adaptation of means to end does not belong to the nature of things.
{ 1 } - ontological argument
{ 2 } - third transcendental Idea of pure reason
{ 3 } - physico-theological argument
{ 4 } - cosmological argument
Everything contingent has a cause. <=> cosmological argument
<= back | menu | forward =>
the end