What is the best match?
third transcendental Idea of pure reason
{ 1 } - There must be at least one intelligent, free cause of adaptation of means to ends.
{ 2 } - is directly reducible to the ontological argument.
{ 3 } - transcendental Ideal
{ 4 } - I cannot admit the possibility of an Ens Realissimum and deny its existence
<= back | menu | forward =>
Directions: Click on a number from 1 to 4.
1 is wrong. Please try again.
third transcendental Idea of pure reason
{ 1 } - There must be at least one intelligent, free cause of adaptation of means to ends.
{ 2 } - is directly reducible to the ontological argument.
{ 3 } - transcendental Ideal
{ 4 } - I cannot admit the possibility of an Ens Realissimum and deny its existence
physico-theological argument <=> There must be at least one intelligent, free cause of adaptation of means to ends.
<= back | menu | forward =>
2 is wrong. Please try again.
third transcendental Idea of pure reason
{ 1 } - There must be at least one intelligent, free cause of adaptation of means to ends.
{ 2 } - is directly reducible to the ontological argument.
{ 3 } - transcendental Ideal
{ 4 } - I cannot admit the possibility of an Ens Realissimum and deny its existence
cosmological argument <=> is directly reducible to the ontological argument.
<= back | menu | forward =>
3 is correct!
third transcendental Idea of pure reason
{ 1 } - There must be at least one intelligent, free cause of adaptation of means to ends.
{ 2 } - is directly reducible to the ontological argument.
{ 3 } - transcendental Ideal
{ 4 } - I cannot admit the possibility of an Ens Realissimum and deny its existence
third transcendental Idea of pure reason <=> transcendental Ideal
<= back | menu | forward =>
Before continuing, you might try some wrong answers.
4 is wrong. Please try again.
third transcendental Idea of pure reason
{ 1 } - There must be at least one intelligent, free cause of adaptation of means to ends.
{ 2 } - is directly reducible to the ontological argument.
{ 3 } - transcendental Ideal
{ 4 } - I cannot admit the possibility of an Ens Realissimum and deny its existence
ontological argument <=> I cannot admit the possibility of an Ens Realissimum and deny its existence
<= back | menu | forward =>
the end