What is your answer?


For Kant, to say that the transcendental ideal exists in reality

    { 1 } - is to make a transcendent use of the categories.
    { 2 } - Is the ontological argument.
    { 3 } - proceeds from physical existence to God as its cause.
    { 4 } - Is a moral proof.
    { 5 } - Is a physico-theological proof.

<= back | menu | forward =>
Directions: Click on a number from 1 to 5.
























 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

























1 is correct!


For Kant, to say that the transcendental ideal exists in reality

<= back | menu | forward =>
Before continuing, you might try some wrong answers.
























 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

























2 is wrong. Please try again.


For Kant, to say that the transcendental ideal exists in reality

    { 1 } - is to make a transcendent use of the categories.
    { 2 } - Is the ontological argument.
    { 3 } - proceeds from physical existence to God as its cause.
    { 4 } - Is a moral proof.
    { 5 } - Is a physico-theological proof.

<= back | menu | forward =>
























 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

























3 is wrong. Please try again.


For Kant, to say that the transcendental ideal exists in reality

    { 1 } - is to make a transcendent use of the categories.
    { 2 } - Is the ontological argument.
    { 3 } - proceeds from physical existence to God as its cause.
    { 4 } - Is a moral proof.
    { 5 } - Is a physico-theological proof.

<= back | menu | forward =>
























 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

























4 is wrong. Please try again.


For Kant, to say that the transcendental ideal exists in reality

    { 1 } - is to make a transcendent use of the categories.
    { 2 } - Is the ontological argument.
    { 3 } - proceeds from physical existence to God as its cause.
    { 4 } - Is a moral proof.
    { 5 } - Is a physico-theological proof.

<= back | menu | forward =>
























 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

























5 is wrong. Please try again.


For Kant, to say that the transcendental ideal exists in reality

    { 1 } - is to make a transcendent use of the categories.
    { 2 } - Is the ontological argument.
    { 3 } - proceeds from physical existence to God as its cause.
    { 4 } - Is a moral proof.
    { 5 } - Is a physico-theological proof.

<= back | menu | forward =>
























 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

























the end