What is your answer?
According to Kant, which is NOT a problem with a theology based on the idea of purpose, finality in Nature?
{ 1 } - The teleological judgment of purpose in Nature involves an intellectual intuition of a limitless being revealed in limited forms.
{ 2 } - The physico-theological argument is based on empirical data, and the universe as a whole is not an empirical datum, so we could not refer the "scattered purposes" which we find in Nature to the unity of a common final end.
{ 3 } - Empirical evidence of design in Nature can bring us only to the concept of a designer, not the concept of a supreme cause of the existence of the universe.
{ 4 } - Empirical evidence of design in Nature cannot determine the moral attributes of a suprahuman designer.
{ 5 } - Reflection on organisms would not bring us to the concept of a divine wisdom which created the whole universe for one supreme final end.
{ 6 } - Empirical evidence of design in Nature cannot determine any attribute of a suprahuman designer except intelligence.
<= back | menu | forward =>
Directions: Click on a number from 1 to 6.
1 is correct!
According to Kant, which is NOT a problem with a theology based on the idea of purpose, finality in Nature?
{ 1 } - The teleological judgment of purpose in Nature involves an intellectual intuition of a limitless being revealed in limited forms.
{ 2 } - The physico-theological argument is based on empirical data, and the universe as a whole is not an empirical datum, so we could not refer the "scattered purposes" which we find in Nature to the unity of a common final end.
{ 3 } - Empirical evidence of design in Nature can bring us only to the concept of a designer, not the concept of a supreme cause of the existence of the universe.
{ 4 } - Empirical evidence of design in Nature cannot determine the moral attributes of a suprahuman designer.
{ 5 } - Reflection on organisms would not bring us to the concept of a divine wisdom which created the whole universe for one supreme final end.
{ 6 } - Empirical evidence of design in Nature cannot determine any attribute of a suprahuman designer except intelligence.
<= back | menu | forward =>
Before continuing, you might try some wrong answers.
2 is wrong. Please try again.
According to Kant, which is NOT a problem with a theology based on the idea of purpose, finality in Nature?
{ 1 } - The teleological judgment of purpose in Nature involves an intellectual intuition of a limitless being revealed in limited forms.
{ 2 } - The physico-theological argument is based on empirical data, and the universe as a whole is not an empirical datum, so we could not refer the "scattered purposes" which we find in Nature to the unity of a common final end.
{ 3 } - Empirical evidence of design in Nature can bring us only to the concept of a designer, not the concept of a supreme cause of the existence of the universe.
{ 4 } - Empirical evidence of design in Nature cannot determine the moral attributes of a suprahuman designer.
{ 5 } - Reflection on organisms would not bring us to the concept of a divine wisdom which created the whole universe for one supreme final end.
{ 6 } - Empirical evidence of design in Nature cannot determine any attribute of a suprahuman designer except intelligence.
See p. 378
<= back | menu | forward =>
3 is wrong. Please try again.
According to Kant, which is NOT a problem with a theology based on the idea of purpose, finality in Nature?
{ 1 } - The teleological judgment of purpose in Nature involves an intellectual intuition of a limitless being revealed in limited forms.
{ 2 } - The physico-theological argument is based on empirical data, and the universe as a whole is not an empirical datum, so we could not refer the "scattered purposes" which we find in Nature to the unity of a common final end.
{ 3 } - Empirical evidence of design in Nature can bring us only to the concept of a designer, not the concept of a supreme cause of the existence of the universe.
{ 4 } - Empirical evidence of design in Nature cannot determine the moral attributes of a suprahuman designer.
{ 5 } - Reflection on organisms would not bring us to the concept of a divine wisdom which created the whole universe for one supreme final end.
{ 6 } - Empirical evidence of design in Nature cannot determine any attribute of a suprahuman designer except intelligence.
See p. 377
<= back | menu | forward =>
4 is wrong. Please try again.
According to Kant, which is NOT a problem with a theology based on the idea of purpose, finality in Nature?
{ 1 } - The teleological judgment of purpose in Nature involves an intellectual intuition of a limitless being revealed in limited forms.
{ 2 } - The physico-theological argument is based on empirical data, and the universe as a whole is not an empirical datum, so we could not refer the "scattered purposes" which we find in Nature to the unity of a common final end.
{ 3 } - Empirical evidence of design in Nature can bring us only to the concept of a designer, not the concept of a supreme cause of the existence of the universe.
{ 4 } - Empirical evidence of design in Nature cannot determine the moral attributes of a suprahuman designer.
{ 5 } - Reflection on organisms would not bring us to the concept of a divine wisdom which created the whole universe for one supreme final end.
{ 6 } - Empirical evidence of design in Nature cannot determine any attribute of a suprahuman designer except intelligence.
See p. 377
<= back | menu | forward =>
5 is wrong. Please try again.
According to Kant, which is NOT a problem with a theology based on the idea of purpose, finality in Nature?
{ 1 } - The teleological judgment of purpose in Nature involves an intellectual intuition of a limitless being revealed in limited forms.
{ 2 } - The physico-theological argument is based on empirical data, and the universe as a whole is not an empirical datum, so we could not refer the "scattered purposes" which we find in Nature to the unity of a common final end.
{ 3 } - Empirical evidence of design in Nature can bring us only to the concept of a designer, not the concept of a supreme cause of the existence of the universe.
{ 4 } - Empirical evidence of design in Nature cannot determine the moral attributes of a suprahuman designer.
{ 5 } - Reflection on organisms would not bring us to the concept of a divine wisdom which created the whole universe for one supreme final end.
{ 6 } - Empirical evidence of design in Nature cannot determine any attribute of a suprahuman designer except intelligence.
See p. 378
<= back | menu | forward =>
6 is wrong. Please try again.
According to Kant, which is NOT a problem with a theology based on the idea of purpose, finality in Nature?
{ 1 } - The teleological judgment of purpose in Nature involves an intellectual intuition of a limitless being revealed in limited forms.
{ 2 } - The physico-theological argument is based on empirical data, and the universe as a whole is not an empirical datum, so we could not refer the "scattered purposes" which we find in Nature to the unity of a common final end.
{ 3 } - Empirical evidence of design in Nature can bring us only to the concept of a designer, not the concept of a supreme cause of the existence of the universe.
{ 4 } - Empirical evidence of design in Nature cannot determine the moral attributes of a suprahuman designer.
{ 5 } - Reflection on organisms would not bring us to the concept of a divine wisdom which created the whole universe for one supreme final end.
{ 6 } - Empirical evidence of design in Nature cannot determine any attribute of a suprahuman designer except intelligence.
See p. 377
<= back | menu | forward =>
the end