What is your answer?
In his "analytic of the beautiful" in the Critique of Judgment, Kant is NOT concerned with:
{ 1 } - what we can say about the aesthictic judgment a priori.
{ 2 } - whether the aesthetic judgment expresses feeling as the only determining ground of the pure judgment of taste, or whether it is a cognitive judgment.
{ 3 } - the necessary and universal features of the aesthetic judgment.
{ 4 } - giving rules or hints for educating and cultivating aesthetic taste.
{ 5 } - the 'disinterestedness of the aesthetic judgment."
{ 6 } - first and foremost the nature of the aesthetic judgment.
{ 7 } - the notion of purposiveness without any concept of a purpose.
<= back | menu | forward =>
Directions: Click on a number from 1 to 7.
1 is wrong. Please try again.
In his "analytic of the beautiful" in the Critique of Judgment, Kant is NOT concerned with:
{ 1 } - what we can say about the aesthictic judgment a priori.
{ 2 } - whether the aesthetic judgment expresses feeling as the only determining ground of the pure judgment of taste, or whether it is a cognitive judgment.
{ 3 } - the necessary and universal features of the aesthetic judgment.
{ 4 } - giving rules or hints for educating and cultivating aesthetic taste.
{ 5 } - the 'disinterestedness of the aesthetic judgment."
{ 6 } - first and foremost the nature of the aesthetic judgment.
{ 7 } - the notion of purposiveness without any concept of a purpose.
See p. 362
<= back | menu | forward =>
2 is wrong. Please try again.
In his "analytic of the beautiful" in the Critique of Judgment, Kant is NOT concerned with:
{ 1 } - what we can say about the aesthictic judgment a priori.
{ 2 } - whether the aesthetic judgment expresses feeling as the only determining ground of the pure judgment of taste, or whether it is a cognitive judgment.
{ 3 } - the necessary and universal features of the aesthetic judgment.
{ 4 } - giving rules or hints for educating and cultivating aesthetic taste.
{ 5 } - the 'disinterestedness of the aesthetic judgment."
{ 6 } - first and foremost the nature of the aesthetic judgment.
{ 7 } - the notion of purposiveness without any concept of a purpose.
See p. 363
<= back | menu | forward =>
3 is wrong. Please try again.
In his "analytic of the beautiful" in the Critique of Judgment, Kant is NOT concerned with:
{ 1 } - what we can say about the aesthictic judgment a priori.
{ 2 } - whether the aesthetic judgment expresses feeling as the only determining ground of the pure judgment of taste, or whether it is a cognitive judgment.
{ 3 } - the necessary and universal features of the aesthetic judgment.
{ 4 } - giving rules or hints for educating and cultivating aesthetic taste.
{ 5 } - the 'disinterestedness of the aesthetic judgment."
{ 6 } - first and foremost the nature of the aesthetic judgment.
{ 7 } - the notion of purposiveness without any concept of a purpose.
See p. 362
<= back | menu | forward =>
4 is correct!
In his "analytic of the beautiful" in the Critique of Judgment, Kant is NOT concerned with:
{ 1 } - what we can say about the aesthictic judgment a priori.
{ 2 } - whether the aesthetic judgment expresses feeling as the only determining ground of the pure judgment of taste, or whether it is a cognitive judgment.
{ 3 } - the necessary and universal features of the aesthetic judgment.
{ 4 } - giving rules or hints for educating and cultivating aesthetic taste.
{ 5 } - the 'disinterestedness of the aesthetic judgment."
{ 6 } - first and foremost the nature of the aesthetic judgment.
{ 7 } - the notion of purposiveness without any concept of a purpose.
See p. 362
<= back | menu | forward =>
Before continuing, you might try some wrong answers.
5 is wrong. Please try again.
In his "analytic of the beautiful" in the Critique of Judgment, Kant is NOT concerned with:
{ 1 } - what we can say about the aesthictic judgment a priori.
{ 2 } - whether the aesthetic judgment expresses feeling as the only determining ground of the pure judgment of taste, or whether it is a cognitive judgment.
{ 3 } - the necessary and universal features of the aesthetic judgment.
{ 4 } - giving rules or hints for educating and cultivating aesthetic taste.
{ 5 } - the 'disinterestedness of the aesthetic judgment."
{ 6 } - first and foremost the nature of the aesthetic judgment.
{ 7 } - the notion of purposiveness without any concept of a purpose.
See p. 362
<= back | menu | forward =>
6 is wrong. Please try again.
In his "analytic of the beautiful" in the Critique of Judgment, Kant is NOT concerned with:
{ 1 } - what we can say about the aesthictic judgment a priori.
{ 2 } - whether the aesthetic judgment expresses feeling as the only determining ground of the pure judgment of taste, or whether it is a cognitive judgment.
{ 3 } - the necessary and universal features of the aesthetic judgment.
{ 4 } - giving rules or hints for educating and cultivating aesthetic taste.
{ 5 } - the 'disinterestedness of the aesthetic judgment."
{ 6 } - first and foremost the nature of the aesthetic judgment.
{ 7 } - the notion of purposiveness without any concept of a purpose.
See p. 362
<= back | menu | forward =>
7 is wrong. Please try again.
In his "analytic of the beautiful" in the Critique of Judgment, Kant is NOT concerned with:
{ 1 } - what we can say about the aesthictic judgment a priori.
{ 2 } - whether the aesthetic judgment expresses feeling as the only determining ground of the pure judgment of taste, or whether it is a cognitive judgment.
{ 3 } - the necessary and universal features of the aesthetic judgment.
{ 4 } - giving rules or hints for educating and cultivating aesthetic taste.
{ 5 } - the 'disinterestedness of the aesthetic judgment."
{ 6 } - first and foremost the nature of the aesthetic judgment.
{ 7 } - the notion of purposiveness without any concept of a purpose.
See p. 362
<= back | menu | forward =>
the end