What is your answer?
The deduction of pure judgments of taste (judgments about the beauty of natural objects):
{ 1 } - is not needed.
{ 2 } - can be given by factual universal consent.
{ 3 } - is not based on the right to presuppose in all men a similar structure of the cognitive powers and of the relations between them.
{ 4 } - can be given by logical proof.
{ 5 } - is based on the pleasure or displeasure arising from the interplay of the powers of imagination and understanding in regard to a given representation.
{ 6 } - is not a justification.
<= back | menu | forward =>
Directions: Click on a number from 1 to 6.
1 is wrong. Please try again.
The deduction of pure judgments of taste (judgments about the beauty of natural objects):
{ 1 } - is not needed.
{ 2 } - can be given by factual universal consent.
{ 3 } - is not based on the right to presuppose in all men a similar structure of the cognitive powers and of the relations between them.
{ 4 } - can be given by logical proof.
{ 5 } - is based on the pleasure or displeasure arising from the interplay of the powers of imagination and understanding in regard to a given representation.
{ 6 } - is not a justification.
See p. 366.
<= back | menu | forward =>
2 is wrong. Please try again.
The deduction of pure judgments of taste (judgments about the beauty of natural objects):
{ 1 } - is not needed.
{ 2 } - can be given by factual universal consent.
{ 3 } - is not based on the right to presuppose in all men a similar structure of the cognitive powers and of the relations between them.
{ 4 } - can be given by logical proof.
{ 5 } - is based on the pleasure or displeasure arising from the interplay of the powers of imagination and understanding in regard to a given representation.
{ 6 } - is not a justification.
No, for the demand for universal consent is made a priori, and is thus not based on empirical evidence and induction.
<= back | menu | forward =>
3 is wrong. Please try again.
The deduction of pure judgments of taste (judgments about the beauty of natural objects):
{ 1 } - is not needed.
{ 2 } - can be given by factual universal consent.
{ 3 } - is not based on the right to presuppose in all men a similar structure of the cognitive powers and of the relations between them.
{ 4 } - can be given by logical proof.
{ 5 } - is based on the pleasure or displeasure arising from the interplay of the powers of imagination and understanding in regard to a given representation.
{ 6 } - is not a justification.
<= back | menu | forward =>
4 is wrong. Please try again.
The deduction of pure judgments of taste (judgments about the beauty of natural objects):
{ 1 } - is not needed.
{ 2 } - can be given by factual universal consent.
{ 3 } - is not based on the right to presuppose in all men a similar structure of the cognitive powers and of the relations between them.
{ 4 } - can be given by logical proof.
{ 5 } - is based on the pleasure or displeasure arising from the interplay of the powers of imagination and understanding in regard to a given representation.
{ 6 } - is not a justification.
No, for the judgment of taste is not a logical judgment.
<= back | menu | forward =>
5 is correct!
The deduction of pure judgments of taste (judgments about the beauty of natural objects):
{ 1 } - is not needed.
{ 2 } - can be given by factual universal consent.
{ 3 } - is not based on the right to presuppose in all men a similar structure of the cognitive powers and of the relations between them.
{ 4 } - can be given by logical proof.
{ 5 } - is based on the pleasure or displeasure arising from the interplay of the powers of imagination and understanding in regard to a given representation.
{ 6 } - is not a justification.
<= back | menu | forward =>
Before continuing, you might try some wrong answers.
6 is wrong. Please try again.
The deduction of pure judgments of taste (judgments about the beauty of natural objects):
{ 1 } - is not needed.
{ 2 } - can be given by factual universal consent.
{ 3 } - is not based on the right to presuppose in all men a similar structure of the cognitive powers and of the relations between them.
{ 4 } - can be given by logical proof.
{ 5 } - is based on the pleasure or displeasure arising from the interplay of the powers of imagination and understanding in regard to a given representation.
{ 6 } - is not a justification.
See p. 366.
<= back | menu | forward =>
the end