What is your answer?
For Kant, a kingdom is not
{ 1 } - a community that one belongs to as a member who gives laws but is subject to them.
{ 2 } - as a sovereign who gives laws but is not subject to the will of another.
{ 3 } - a kingdom of ends.because the laws have in view the relation of the members to one another as ends and means.
{ 4 } - the systematic union of rational beings through common laws.
{ 5 } - independent of the moral law.
{ 6 } - a community in which rational beings ought to act as though through their maxims they were law-making members of a kingdom of ends.
<= back | menu | forward =>
Directions: Click on a number from 1 to 6.
1 is wrong. Please try again.
For Kant, a kingdom is not
{ 1 } - a community that one belongs to as a member who gives laws but is subject to them.
{ 2 } - as a sovereign who gives laws but is not subject to the will of another.
{ 3 } - a kingdom of ends.because the laws have in view the relation of the members to one another as ends and means.
{ 4 } - the systematic union of rational beings through common laws.
{ 5 } - independent of the moral law.
{ 6 } - a community in which rational beings ought to act as though through their maxims they were law-making members of a kingdom of ends.
That is one of the ways of belonging to it.
<= back | menu | forward =>
2 is wrong. Please try again.
For Kant, a kingdom is not
{ 1 } - a community that one belongs to as a member who gives laws but is subject to them.
{ 2 } - as a sovereign who gives laws but is not subject to the will of another.
{ 3 } - a kingdom of ends.because the laws have in view the relation of the members to one another as ends and means.
{ 4 } - the systematic union of rational beings through common laws.
{ 5 } - independent of the moral law.
{ 6 } - a community in which rational beings ought to act as though through their maxims they were law-making members of a kingdom of ends.
That is one of the two ways of belonging to it. Here Kant seems to mean God.
<= back | menu | forward =>
3 is wrong. Please try again.
For Kant, a kingdom is not
{ 1 } - a community that one belongs to as a member who gives laws but is subject to them.
{ 2 } - as a sovereign who gives laws but is not subject to the will of another.
{ 3 } - a kingdom of ends.because the laws have in view the relation of the members to one another as ends and means.
{ 4 } - the systematic union of rational beings through common laws.
{ 5 } - independent of the moral law.
{ 6 } - a community in which rational beings ought to act as though through their maxims they were law-making members of a kingdom of ends.
<= back | menu | forward =>
4 is wrong. Please try again.
For Kant, a kingdom is not
{ 1 } - a community that one belongs to as a member who gives laws but is subject to them.
{ 2 } - as a sovereign who gives laws but is not subject to the will of another.
{ 3 } - a kingdom of ends.because the laws have in view the relation of the members to one another as ends and means.
{ 4 } - the systematic union of rational beings through common laws.
{ 5 } - independent of the moral law.
{ 6 } - a community in which rational beings ought to act as though through their maxims they were law-making members of a kingdom of ends.
Yes, it is. See p. 331.
<= back | menu | forward =>
5 is correct!
For Kant, a kingdom is not
{ 1 } - a community that one belongs to as a member who gives laws but is subject to them.
{ 2 } - as a sovereign who gives laws but is not subject to the will of another.
{ 3 } - a kingdom of ends.because the laws have in view the relation of the members to one another as ends and means.
{ 4 } - the systematic union of rational beings through common laws.
{ 5 } - independent of the moral law.
{ 6 } - a community in which rational beings ought to act as though through their maxims they were law-making members of a kingdom of ends.
Its members must obey the categorical imperative to treat each other as ends in themselves rather than merely as means to the end.
<= back | menu | forward =>
Before continuing, you might try some wrong answers.
6 is wrong. Please try again.
For Kant, a kingdom is not
{ 1 } - a community that one belongs to as a member who gives laws but is subject to them.
{ 2 } - as a sovereign who gives laws but is not subject to the will of another.
{ 3 } - a kingdom of ends.because the laws have in view the relation of the members to one another as ends and means.
{ 4 } - the systematic union of rational beings through common laws.
{ 5 } - independent of the moral law.
{ 6 } - a community in which rational beings ought to act as though through their maxims they were law-making members of a kingdom of ends.
<= back | menu | forward =>
the end