What is your answer?
Pure Ethics does not
{ 1 } - have the same meaning as metaphysics of morals.
{ 2 } - deduce all moral laws from pure practical reason.
{ 3 } - give a priori laws of rational beings.
{ 4 } - have a concern about activities such as adultery, which involve having a body.
{ 5 } - deal with the supreme principles of morality and the nature of moral obligation.
<= back | menu | forward =>
Directions: Click on a number from 1 to 5.
1 is wrong. Please try again.
Pure Ethics does not
{ 1 } - have the same meaning as metaphysics of morals.
{ 2 } - deduce all moral laws from pure practical reason.
{ 3 } - give a priori laws of rational beings.
{ 4 } - have a concern about activities such as adultery, which involve having a body.
{ 5 } - deal with the supreme principles of morality and the nature of moral obligation.
Yes, that is another name for it.
<= back | menu | forward =>
2 is correct!
Pure Ethics does not
{ 1 } - have the same meaning as metaphysics of morals.
{ 2 } - deduce all moral laws from pure practical reason.
{ 3 } - give a priori laws of rational beings.
{ 4 } - have a concern about activities such as adultery, which involve having a body.
{ 5 } - deal with the supreme principles of morality and the nature of moral obligation.
Just as the metaphysics of nature did not deduce all laws of empirical physics--knowing that every event has a cause does not imply what the cause of the event is, and knowing the moral law does not imply that stealing is wrong. That stealing is wrong must be decided by whether or not one is willing to have stealing as a universal law.
<= back | menu | forward =>
Before continuing, you might try some wrong answers.
3 is wrong. Please try again.
Pure Ethics does not
{ 1 } - have the same meaning as metaphysics of morals.
{ 2 } - deduce all moral laws from pure practical reason.
{ 3 } - give a priori laws of rational beings.
{ 4 } - have a concern about activities such as adultery, which involve having a body.
{ 5 } - deal with the supreme principles of morality and the nature of moral obligation.
<= back | menu | forward =>
4 is wrong. Please try again.
Pure Ethics does not
{ 1 } - have the same meaning as metaphysics of morals.
{ 2 } - deduce all moral laws from pure practical reason.
{ 3 } - give a priori laws of rational beings.
{ 4 } - have a concern about activities such as adultery, which involve having a body.
{ 5 } - deal with the supreme principles of morality and the nature of moral obligation.
Not according to Kant. See p.311.
<= back | menu | forward =>
5 is wrong. Please try again.
Pure Ethics does not
{ 1 } - have the same meaning as metaphysics of morals.
{ 2 } - deduce all moral laws from pure practical reason.
{ 3 } - give a priori laws of rational beings.
{ 4 } - have a concern about activities such as adultery, which involve having a body.
{ 5 } - deal with the supreme principles of morality and the nature of moral obligation.
That is exactly what it deals with..
<= back | menu | forward =>
the end