What is your answer?
The mathematical principles of the understanding
{ 1 } - are not called mathematical because they justify the application of mathematics to experience.
{ 2 } - are called mathematical because they are mathematical propositions.
{ 3 } - do not enable us to predict that future sensations will have extensive and intensive magnitudes.
{ 4 } - enable us to predict what future intuitions or their quality (e.g. that the next sensation will be red) will be.
{ 5 } - enable us to make predictions about future intuitions or perceptions.
<= back | menu | forward =>
Directions: Click on a number from 1 to 5.
1 is wrong. Please try again.
The mathematical principles of the understanding
{ 1 } - are not called mathematical because they justify the application of mathematics to experience.
{ 2 } - are called mathematical because they are mathematical propositions.
{ 3 } - do not enable us to predict that future sensations will have extensive and intensive magnitudes.
{ 4 } - enable us to predict what future intuitions or their quality (e.g. that the next sensation will be red) will be.
{ 5 } - enable us to make predictions about future intuitions or perceptions.
No, that is the reason they are called mathematical.
<= back | menu | forward =>
2 is wrong. Please try again.
The mathematical principles of the understanding
{ 1 } - are not called mathematical because they justify the application of mathematics to experience.
{ 2 } - are called mathematical because they are mathematical propositions.
{ 3 } - do not enable us to predict that future sensations will have extensive and intensive magnitudes.
{ 4 } - enable us to predict what future intuitions or their quality (e.g. that the next sensation will be red) will be.
{ 5 } - enable us to make predictions about future intuitions or perceptions.
Do they look like mathematical propositions? Take a nap.
<= back | menu | forward =>
3 is wrong. Please try again.
The mathematical principles of the understanding
{ 1 } - are not called mathematical because they justify the application of mathematics to experience.
{ 2 } - are called mathematical because they are mathematical propositions.
{ 3 } - do not enable us to predict that future sensations will have extensive and intensive magnitudes.
{ 4 } - enable us to predict what future intuitions or their quality (e.g. that the next sensation will be red) will be.
{ 5 } - enable us to make predictions about future intuitions or perceptions.
Yes, they do.
<= back | menu | forward =>
4 is wrong. Please try again.
The mathematical principles of the understanding
{ 1 } - are not called mathematical because they justify the application of mathematics to experience.
{ 2 } - are called mathematical because they are mathematical propositions.
{ 3 } - do not enable us to predict that future sensations will have extensive and intensive magnitudes.
{ 4 } - enable us to predict what future intuitions or their quality (e.g. that the next sensation will be red) will be.
{ 5 } - enable us to make predictions about future intuitions or perceptions.
<= back | menu | forward =>
5 is correct!
The mathematical principles of the understanding
{ 1 } - are not called mathematical because they justify the application of mathematics to experience.
{ 2 } - are called mathematical because they are mathematical propositions.
{ 3 } - do not enable us to predict that future sensations will have extensive and intensive magnitudes.
{ 4 } - enable us to predict what future intuitions or their quality (e.g. that the next sensation will be red) will be.
{ 5 } - enable us to make predictions about future intuitions or perceptions.
See p. 261.
<= back | menu | forward =>
Before continuing, you might try some wrong answers.
the end