What is the best match?
Analogies of Experience
{ 1 } - They have the underlying principle, 'Experience is possible only through the representation of a necessary connection of perceptions.
{ 2 } - "In every change of appearances the substance remains, and its quantum in Nature neither increases nor diminishes."
{ 3 } - "All substances, so far as they can be perceived as coexistent in space, are in thorough-going interaction."
{ 4 } - does not tell us what the cause of a perception is, it just tells us that there is one.
<= back | menu | forward =>
Directions: Click on a number from 1 to 4.
1 is correct!
Analogies of Experience
{ 1 } - They have the underlying principle, 'Experience is possible only through the representation of a necessary connection of perceptions.
{ 2 } - "In every change of appearances the substance remains, and its quantum in Nature neither increases nor diminishes."
{ 3 } - "All substances, so far as they can be perceived as coexistent in space, are in thorough-going interaction."
{ 4 } - does not tell us what the cause of a perception is, it just tells us that there is one.
Analogies of Experience <=> They have the underlying principle, 'Experience is possible only through the representation of a necessary connection of perceptions.
<= back | menu | forward =>
Before continuing, you might try some wrong answers.
2 is wrong. Please try again.
Analogies of Experience
{ 1 } - They have the underlying principle, 'Experience is possible only through the representation of a necessary connection of perceptions.
{ 2 } - "In every change of appearances the substance remains, and its quantum in Nature neither increases nor diminishes."
{ 3 } - "All substances, so far as they can be perceived as coexistent in space, are in thorough-going interaction."
{ 4 } - does not tell us what the cause of a perception is, it just tells us that there is one.
First Analogy of Experience <=> "In every change of appearances the substance remains, and its quantum in Nature neither increases nor diminishes."
<= back | menu | forward =>
3 is wrong. Please try again.
Analogies of Experience
{ 1 } - They have the underlying principle, 'Experience is possible only through the representation of a necessary connection of perceptions.
{ 2 } - "In every change of appearances the substance remains, and its quantum in Nature neither increases nor diminishes."
{ 3 } - "All substances, so far as they can be perceived as coexistent in space, are in thorough-going interaction."
{ 4 } - does not tell us what the cause of a perception is, it just tells us that there is one.
Third Analogy of Experience <=> "All substances, so far as they can be perceived as coexistent in space, are in thorough-going interaction."
<= back | menu | forward =>
4 is wrong. Please try again.
Analogies of Experience
{ 1 } - They have the underlying principle, 'Experience is possible only through the representation of a necessary connection of perceptions.
{ 2 } - "In every change of appearances the substance remains, and its quantum in Nature neither increases nor diminishes."
{ 3 } - "All substances, so far as they can be perceived as coexistent in space, are in thorough-going interaction."
{ 4 } - does not tell us what the cause of a perception is, it just tells us that there is one.
Second Analogy of Experience <=> does not tell us what the cause of a perception is, it just tells us that there is one.
<= back | menu | forward =>
the end