What is your answer?
A "transcendental deduction" of the categories
{ 1 } - shows that the categories are the a priori conditions for the possibility of all experience.
{ 2 } - shows that categories are the a priori conditions for objects being given to us.
{ 3 } - does not show that they are the a priori conditions for objects being thought.
{ 4 } - shows that categories are the a priori conditions for objects being senses.
{ 5 } - is not a justification of the categories.
<= back | menu | forward =>
Directions: Click on a number from 1 to 5.
1 is correct!
A "transcendental deduction" of the categories
{ 1 } - shows that the categories are the a priori conditions for the possibility of all experience.
{ 2 } - shows that categories are the a priori conditions for objects being given to us.
{ 3 } - does not show that they are the a priori conditions for objects being thought.
{ 4 } - shows that categories are the a priori conditions for objects being senses.
{ 5 } - is not a justification of the categories.
<= back | menu | forward =>
Before continuing, you might try some wrong answers.
2 is wrong. Please try again.
A "transcendental deduction" of the categories
{ 1 } - shows that the categories are the a priori conditions for the possibility of all experience.
{ 2 } - shows that categories are the a priori conditions for objects being given to us.
{ 3 } - does not show that they are the a priori conditions for objects being thought.
{ 4 } - shows that categories are the a priori conditions for objects being senses.
{ 5 } - is not a justification of the categories.
No, space and time are those conditions. See p. 252
<= back | menu | forward =>
3 is wrong. Please try again.
A "transcendental deduction" of the categories
{ 1 } - shows that the categories are the a priori conditions for the possibility of all experience.
{ 2 } - shows that categories are the a priori conditions for objects being given to us.
{ 3 } - does not show that they are the a priori conditions for objects being thought.
{ 4 } - shows that categories are the a priori conditions for objects being senses.
{ 5 } - is not a justification of the categories.
Yes, it does. See p. 252.
<= back | menu | forward =>
4 is wrong. Please try again.
A "transcendental deduction" of the categories
{ 1 } - shows that the categories are the a priori conditions for the possibility of all experience.
{ 2 } - shows that categories are the a priori conditions for objects being given to us.
{ 3 } - does not show that they are the a priori conditions for objects being thought.
{ 4 } - shows that categories are the a priori conditions for objects being senses.
{ 5 } - is not a justification of the categories.
No, space and time are those conditions. See p. 252.
<= back | menu | forward =>
5 is wrong. Please try again.
A "transcendental deduction" of the categories
{ 1 } - shows that the categories are the a priori conditions for the possibility of all experience.
{ 2 } - shows that categories are the a priori conditions for objects being given to us.
{ 3 } - does not show that they are the a priori conditions for objects being thought.
{ 4 } - shows that categories are the a priori conditions for objects being senses.
{ 5 } - is not a justification of the categories.
Yes, it is, since "deduction" means "justification."
<= back | menu | forward =>
the end