What is your answer?
The fact that there is evidence that non-Euclidean geometries describe our sense experience better than Euclidean implies that
{ 1 } - Kant has not proved from geometry that there is a form of space that is the source of synthetic a priori propositions of geometry.
{ 2 } - if there is a form of space that determines external sensation it is a non-Euclidean form.
{ 3 } - Kant has not shown how it is possible to have synthetic a priori propositions of geometry.
{ 4 } - Kant was wrong in identifying space with Euclidean space.
{ 5 } - Euclidean geometry is wrong.
{ 6 } - Kant has not proven how geometry is possible as a science.
{ 7 } - none of the above
{ 8 } - all of the above
<= back | menu | forward =>
Directions: Click on a number from 1 to 8.
1 is wrong. Please try again.
The fact that there is evidence that non-Euclidean geometries describe our sense experience better than Euclidean implies that
{ 1 } - Kant has not proved from geometry that there is a form of space that is the source of synthetic a priori propositions of geometry.
{ 2 } - if there is a form of space that determines external sensation it is a non-Euclidean form.
{ 3 } - Kant has not shown how it is possible to have synthetic a priori propositions of geometry.
{ 4 } - Kant was wrong in identifying space with Euclidean space.
{ 5 } - Euclidean geometry is wrong.
{ 6 } - Kant has not proven how geometry is possible as a science.
{ 7 } - none of the above
{ 8 } - all of the above
<= back | menu | forward =>
2 is wrong. Please try again.
The fact that there is evidence that non-Euclidean geometries describe our sense experience better than Euclidean implies that
{ 1 } - Kant has not proved from geometry that there is a form of space that is the source of synthetic a priori propositions of geometry.
{ 2 } - if there is a form of space that determines external sensation it is a non-Euclidean form.
{ 3 } - Kant has not shown how it is possible to have synthetic a priori propositions of geometry.
{ 4 } - Kant was wrong in identifying space with Euclidean space.
{ 5 } - Euclidean geometry is wrong.
{ 6 } - Kant has not proven how geometry is possible as a science.
{ 7 } - none of the above
{ 8 } - all of the above
<= back | menu | forward =>
3 is wrong. Please try again.
The fact that there is evidence that non-Euclidean geometries describe our sense experience better than Euclidean implies that
{ 1 } - Kant has not proved from geometry that there is a form of space that is the source of synthetic a priori propositions of geometry.
{ 2 } - if there is a form of space that determines external sensation it is a non-Euclidean form.
{ 3 } - Kant has not shown how it is possible to have synthetic a priori propositions of geometry.
{ 4 } - Kant was wrong in identifying space with Euclidean space.
{ 5 } - Euclidean geometry is wrong.
{ 6 } - Kant has not proven how geometry is possible as a science.
{ 7 } - none of the above
{ 8 } - all of the above
<= back | menu | forward =>
4 is wrong. Please try again.
The fact that there is evidence that non-Euclidean geometries describe our sense experience better than Euclidean implies that
{ 1 } - Kant has not proved from geometry that there is a form of space that is the source of synthetic a priori propositions of geometry.
{ 2 } - if there is a form of space that determines external sensation it is a non-Euclidean form.
{ 3 } - Kant has not shown how it is possible to have synthetic a priori propositions of geometry.
{ 4 } - Kant was wrong in identifying space with Euclidean space.
{ 5 } - Euclidean geometry is wrong.
{ 6 } - Kant has not proven how geometry is possible as a science.
{ 7 } - none of the above
{ 8 } - all of the above
<= back | menu | forward =>
5 is wrong. Please try again.
The fact that there is evidence that non-Euclidean geometries describe our sense experience better than Euclidean implies that
{ 1 } - Kant has not proved from geometry that there is a form of space that is the source of synthetic a priori propositions of geometry.
{ 2 } - if there is a form of space that determines external sensation it is a non-Euclidean form.
{ 3 } - Kant has not shown how it is possible to have synthetic a priori propositions of geometry.
{ 4 } - Kant was wrong in identifying space with Euclidean space.
{ 5 } - Euclidean geometry is wrong.
{ 6 } - Kant has not proven how geometry is possible as a science.
{ 7 } - none of the above
{ 8 } - all of the above
<= back | menu | forward =>
6 is wrong. Please try again.
The fact that there is evidence that non-Euclidean geometries describe our sense experience better than Euclidean implies that
{ 1 } - Kant has not proved from geometry that there is a form of space that is the source of synthetic a priori propositions of geometry.
{ 2 } - if there is a form of space that determines external sensation it is a non-Euclidean form.
{ 3 } - Kant has not shown how it is possible to have synthetic a priori propositions of geometry.
{ 4 } - Kant was wrong in identifying space with Euclidean space.
{ 5 } - Euclidean geometry is wrong.
{ 6 } - Kant has not proven how geometry is possible as a science.
{ 7 } - none of the above
{ 8 } - all of the above
<= back | menu | forward =>
7 is wrong. Please try again.
The fact that there is evidence that non-Euclidean geometries describe our sense experience better than Euclidean implies that
{ 1 } - Kant has not proved from geometry that there is a form of space that is the source of synthetic a priori propositions of geometry.
{ 2 } - if there is a form of space that determines external sensation it is a non-Euclidean form.
{ 3 } - Kant has not shown how it is possible to have synthetic a priori propositions of geometry.
{ 4 } - Kant was wrong in identifying space with Euclidean space.
{ 5 } - Euclidean geometry is wrong.
{ 6 } - Kant has not proven how geometry is possible as a science.
{ 7 } - none of the above
{ 8 } - all of the above
<= back | menu | forward =>
8 is correct!
The fact that there is evidence that non-Euclidean geometries describe our sense experience better than Euclidean implies that
{ 1 } - Kant has not proved from geometry that there is a form of space that is the source of synthetic a priori propositions of geometry.
{ 2 } - if there is a form of space that determines external sensation it is a non-Euclidean form.
{ 3 } - Kant has not shown how it is possible to have synthetic a priori propositions of geometry.
{ 4 } - Kant was wrong in identifying space with Euclidean space.
{ 5 } - Euclidean geometry is wrong.
{ 6 } - Kant has not proven how geometry is possible as a science.
{ 7 } - none of the above
{ 8 } - all of the above
<= back | menu | forward =>
Before continuing, you might try some wrong answers.
the end