What is your answer?
For Kant, the two types of synthetic judgment
{ 1 } - are exemplified in the proposition "Everything which happens has its cause."
{ 2 } - are exemplified in the proposition "All members of the x tribe are short."
{ 3 } - involve the concept of the predicate being underived from experience.
{ 4 } - are not determined by whether or not the concept of the predicate is derived from experience.
{ 5 } - are rejected by empiricist philosophers such as Hume.
{ 6 } - involve the concept of the predicate being found in experience.
<= back | menu | forward =>
Directions: Click on a number from 1 to 6.
1 is wrong. Please try again.
For Kant, the two types of synthetic judgment
{ 1 } - are exemplified in the proposition "Everything which happens has its cause."
{ 2 } - are exemplified in the proposition "All members of the x tribe are short."
{ 3 } - involve the concept of the predicate being underived from experience.
{ 4 } - are not determined by whether or not the concept of the predicate is derived from experience.
{ 5 } - are rejected by empiricist philosophers such as Hume.
{ 6 } - involve the concept of the predicate being found in experience.
No, that is an example of a synthetic a priori judgment.
<= back | menu | forward =>
2 is wrong. Please try again.
For Kant, the two types of synthetic judgment
{ 1 } - are exemplified in the proposition "Everything which happens has its cause."
{ 2 } - are exemplified in the proposition "All members of the x tribe are short."
{ 3 } - involve the concept of the predicate being underived from experience.
{ 4 } - are not determined by whether or not the concept of the predicate is derived from experience.
{ 5 } - are rejected by empiricist philosophers such as Hume.
{ 6 } - involve the concept of the predicate being found in experience.
No, that is an example of a synthetic a posteriori judgment.
<= back | menu | forward =>
3 is wrong. Please try again.
For Kant, the two types of synthetic judgment
{ 1 } - are exemplified in the proposition "Everything which happens has its cause."
{ 2 } - are exemplified in the proposition "All members of the x tribe are short."
{ 3 } - involve the concept of the predicate being underived from experience.
{ 4 } - are not determined by whether or not the concept of the predicate is derived from experience.
{ 5 } - are rejected by empiricist philosophers such as Hume.
{ 6 } - involve the concept of the predicate being found in experience.
No, that is true only of the synthetic a priori judgment.
<= back | menu | forward =>
4 is wrong. Please try again.
For Kant, the two types of synthetic judgment
{ 1 } - are exemplified in the proposition "Everything which happens has its cause."
{ 2 } - are exemplified in the proposition "All members of the x tribe are short."
{ 3 } - involve the concept of the predicate being underived from experience.
{ 4 } - are not determined by whether or not the concept of the predicate is derived from experience.
{ 5 } - are rejected by empiricist philosophers such as Hume.
{ 6 } - involve the concept of the predicate being found in experience.
Yes, they are. The former is a posteriori and the latter is a priori.
<= back | menu | forward =>
5 is correct!
For Kant, the two types of synthetic judgment
{ 1 } - are exemplified in the proposition "Everything which happens has its cause."
{ 2 } - are exemplified in the proposition "All members of the x tribe are short."
{ 3 } - involve the concept of the predicate being underived from experience.
{ 4 } - are not determined by whether or not the concept of the predicate is derived from experience.
{ 5 } - are rejected by empiricist philosophers such as Hume.
{ 6 } - involve the concept of the predicate being found in experience.
They do not accept the existence of synthetic a priori judgments, since all judgments for them are either analytic or synthetic a posteriori, thus they accept one type but not the other.
<= back | menu | forward =>
Before continuing, you might try some wrong answers.
6 is wrong. Please try again.
For Kant, the two types of synthetic judgment
{ 1 } - are exemplified in the proposition "Everything which happens has its cause."
{ 2 } - are exemplified in the proposition "All members of the x tribe are short."
{ 3 } - involve the concept of the predicate being underived from experience.
{ 4 } - are not determined by whether or not the concept of the predicate is derived from experience.
{ 5 } - are rejected by empiricist philosophers such as Hume.
{ 6 } - involve the concept of the predicate being found in experience.
No, that is true only of the synthetic a posteriori judgment. See p. 220
<= back | menu | forward =>
the end