What is your answer?

Hume's statement that if we find in our libraries a book that contains neither demonstrative nor moral reasoning we should burn it implies

    { 1 } - that his book need not be burned becuse it contains moral reasoning.
    { 2 } - that his book need not be burned because it contains experimental reasoning concerning matters of fact and existence.
    { 3 } - that his book need not be burned because it contains demonstrative reasoning.
    { 4 } - that his book need not be burned because it contains reasoning concerning quantity and number.
    { 5 } - that we should burn his book.

<= back | menu | forward =>
Directions: Click on a number from 1 to 5.
























 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

























1 is wrong. Please try again.

Hume's statement that if we find in our libraries a book that contains neither demonstrative nor moral reasoning we should burn it implies

It does not contain such reasoning.

<= back | menu | forward =>
























 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

























2 is wrong. Please try again.

Hume's statement that if we find in our libraries a book that contains neither demonstrative nor moral reasoning we should burn it implies

    { 1 } - that his book need not be burned becuse it contains moral reasoning.
    { 2 } - that his book need not be burned because it contains experimental reasoning concerning matters of fact and existence.
    { 3 } - that his book need not be burned because it contains demonstrative reasoning.
    { 4 } - that his book need not be burned because it contains reasoning concerning quantity and number.
    { 5 } - that we should burn his book.

That is moral reasoning.

<= back | menu | forward =>
























 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

























3 is wrong. Please try again.

Hume's statement that if we find in our libraries a book that contains neither demonstrative nor moral reasoning we should burn it implies

    { 1 } - that his book need not be burned becuse it contains moral reasoning.
    { 2 } - that his book need not be burned because it contains experimental reasoning concerning matters of fact and existence.
    { 3 } - that his book need not be burned because it contains demonstrative reasoning.
    { 4 } - that his book need not be burned because it contains reasoning concerning quantity and number.
    { 5 } - that we should burn his book.

It does not contain such reasoning.

<= back | menu | forward =>
























 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

























4 is wrong. Please try again.

Hume's statement that if we find in our libraries a book that contains neither demonstrative nor moral reasoning we should burn it implies

    { 1 } - that his book need not be burned becuse it contains moral reasoning.
    { 2 } - that his book need not be burned because it contains experimental reasoning concerning matters of fact and existence.
    { 3 } - that his book need not be burned because it contains demonstrative reasoning.
    { 4 } - that his book need not be burned because it contains reasoning concerning quantity and number.
    { 5 } - that we should burn his book.

That is demonstrative reasoning.

<= back | menu | forward =>
























 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

























5 is correct!

Hume's statement that if we find in our libraries a book that contains neither demonstrative nor moral reasoning we should burn it implies

    { 1 } - that his book need not be burned becuse it contains moral reasoning.
    { 2 } - that his book need not be burned because it contains experimental reasoning concerning matters of fact and existence.
    { 3 } - that his book need not be burned because it contains demonstrative reasoning.
    { 4 } - that his book need not be burned because it contains reasoning concerning quantity and number.
    { 5 } - that we should burn his book.

It contains neither demonstrative nor moral reasoning.

<= back | menu | forward =>
Before continuing, you might try some wrong answers.
























 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

























the end