What is your answer?
Which is NOT the authors' criticism of the Freudian model of the human person?
{ 1 } - Intuitive intellection, the basis of scientific, artistic, ethical, and religious thinking, has to be attributed to the irrational id.
{ 2 } - It had no insight into how the unconscious part of our psyche can interfere with the working of our conscious thought.
{ 3 } - It does not distinguish clearly between intellectual reason and intuition, and this led it to identify reason with the ego and to attribute the work of intuition to the unconscious.
{ 4 } - It does not give any place to the free will which the intellect makes possible by its intuition of ends (goals) and its reasoning about means in relation to ends.
{ 5 } - It confused the superconsciousness (intuitive activities) with the unconscious because both are outside the verbalizable consciousness of the ego.
{ 6 } - It does not clearly distinguish between the animal level of sensation and appetition and the intellectual level of abstract cognition and free will.
<= back | menu | forward =>
Directions: Click on a number from 1 to 6.
1 is wrong. Please try again.
Which is NOT the authors' criticism of the Freudian model of the human person?
{ 1 } - Intuitive intellection, the basis of scientific, artistic, ethical, and religious thinking, has to be attributed to the irrational id.
{ 2 } - It had no insight into how the unconscious part of our psyche can interfere with the working of our conscious thought.
{ 3 } - It does not distinguish clearly between intellectual reason and intuition, and this led it to identify reason with the ego and to attribute the work of intuition to the unconscious.
{ 4 } - It does not give any place to the free will which the intellect makes possible by its intuition of ends (goals) and its reasoning about means in relation to ends.
{ 5 } - It confused the superconsciousness (intuitive activities) with the unconscious because both are outside the verbalizable consciousness of the ego.
{ 6 } - It does not clearly distinguish between the animal level of sensation and appetition and the intellectual level of abstract cognition and free will.
See p. 359.
<= back | menu | forward =>
2 is correct!
Which is NOT the authors' criticism of the Freudian model of the human person?
{ 1 } - Intuitive intellection, the basis of scientific, artistic, ethical, and religious thinking, has to be attributed to the irrational id.
{ 2 } - It had no insight into how the unconscious part of our psyche can interfere with the working of our conscious thought.
{ 3 } - It does not distinguish clearly between intellectual reason and intuition, and this led it to identify reason with the ego and to attribute the work of intuition to the unconscious.
{ 4 } - It does not give any place to the free will which the intellect makes possible by its intuition of ends (goals) and its reasoning about means in relation to ends.
{ 5 } - It confused the superconsciousness (intuitive activities) with the unconscious because both are outside the verbalizable consciousness of the ego.
{ 6 } - It does not clearly distinguish between the animal level of sensation and appetition and the intellectual level of abstract cognition and free will.
On the contrary, the authors think that this insight should be incorporated into the Aristotelian model of the person. See p. 359.
<= back | menu | forward =>
Before continuing, you might try some wrong answers.
3 is wrong. Please try again.
Which is NOT the authors' criticism of the Freudian model of the human person?
{ 1 } - Intuitive intellection, the basis of scientific, artistic, ethical, and religious thinking, has to be attributed to the irrational id.
{ 2 } - It had no insight into how the unconscious part of our psyche can interfere with the working of our conscious thought.
{ 3 } - It does not distinguish clearly between intellectual reason and intuition, and this led it to identify reason with the ego and to attribute the work of intuition to the unconscious.
{ 4 } - It does not give any place to the free will which the intellect makes possible by its intuition of ends (goals) and its reasoning about means in relation to ends.
{ 5 } - It confused the superconsciousness (intuitive activities) with the unconscious because both are outside the verbalizable consciousness of the ego.
{ 6 } - It does not clearly distinguish between the animal level of sensation and appetition and the intellectual level of abstract cognition and free will.
For Freud the highest activities of the human, artistic creativity and religious commitment, had to be unconscious, irrational activities. See p. 358.
<= back | menu | forward =>
4 is wrong. Please try again.
Which is NOT the authors' criticism of the Freudian model of the human person?
{ 1 } - Intuitive intellection, the basis of scientific, artistic, ethical, and religious thinking, has to be attributed to the irrational id.
{ 2 } - It had no insight into how the unconscious part of our psyche can interfere with the working of our conscious thought.
{ 3 } - It does not distinguish clearly between intellectual reason and intuition, and this led it to identify reason with the ego and to attribute the work of intuition to the unconscious.
{ 4 } - It does not give any place to the free will which the intellect makes possible by its intuition of ends (goals) and its reasoning about means in relation to ends.
{ 5 } - It confused the superconsciousness (intuitive activities) with the unconscious because both are outside the verbalizable consciousness of the ego.
{ 6 } - It does not clearly distinguish between the animal level of sensation and appetition and the intellectual level of abstract cognition and free will.
Although psychoanalytic therapy is supposed to work by helping clients come to a realistic self-understanding and a free control over their lives, Freud did not provide an adequate model for such understanding.
<= back | menu | forward =>
5 is wrong. Please try again.
Which is NOT the authors' criticism of the Freudian model of the human person?
{ 1 } - Intuitive intellection, the basis of scientific, artistic, ethical, and religious thinking, has to be attributed to the irrational id.
{ 2 } - It had no insight into how the unconscious part of our psyche can interfere with the working of our conscious thought.
{ 3 } - It does not distinguish clearly between intellectual reason and intuition, and this led it to identify reason with the ego and to attribute the work of intuition to the unconscious.
{ 4 } - It does not give any place to the free will which the intellect makes possible by its intuition of ends (goals) and its reasoning about means in relation to ends.
{ 5 } - It confused the superconsciousness (intuitive activities) with the unconscious because both are outside the verbalizable consciousness of the ego.
{ 6 } - It does not clearly distinguish between the animal level of sensation and appetition and the intellectual level of abstract cognition and free will.
See p. 359.
<= back | menu | forward =>
6 is wrong. Please try again.
Which is NOT the authors' criticism of the Freudian model of the human person?
{ 1 } - Intuitive intellection, the basis of scientific, artistic, ethical, and religious thinking, has to be attributed to the irrational id.
{ 2 } - It had no insight into how the unconscious part of our psyche can interfere with the working of our conscious thought.
{ 3 } - It does not distinguish clearly between intellectual reason and intuition, and this led it to identify reason with the ego and to attribute the work of intuition to the unconscious.
{ 4 } - It does not give any place to the free will which the intellect makes possible by its intuition of ends (goals) and its reasoning about means in relation to ends.
{ 5 } - It confused the superconsciousness (intuitive activities) with the unconscious because both are outside the verbalizable consciousness of the ego.
{ 6 } - It does not clearly distinguish between the animal level of sensation and appetition and the intellectual level of abstract cognition and free will.
See pp. 358-9
<= back | menu | forward =>
the end