What is your answer?
The authors do NOT think that loss of anatomical integrity for the sake of someone else's functional integrity justifies
{ 1 } - skin grafts.
{ 2 } - blood transfusions.
{ 3 } - donation of a kidney.
{ 4 } - a cornea transplant.
<= back | menu | forward =>
Directions: Click on a number from 1 to 4.
1 is wrong. Please try again.
The authors do NOT think that loss of anatomical integrity for the sake of someone else's functional integrity justifies
{ 1 } - skin grafts.
{ 2 } - blood transfusions.
{ 3 } - donation of a kidney.
{ 4 } - a cornea transplant.
See p. 333.
<= back | menu | forward =>
2 is wrong. Please try again.
The authors do NOT think that loss of anatomical integrity for the sake of someone else's functional integrity justifies
{ 1 } - skin grafts.
{ 2 } - blood transfusions.
{ 3 } - donation of a kidney.
{ 4 } - a cornea transplant.
See p. 333.
<= back | menu | forward =>
3 is wrong. Please try again.
The authors do NOT think that loss of anatomical integrity for the sake of someone else's functional integrity justifies
{ 1 } - skin grafts.
{ 2 } - blood transfusions.
{ 3 } - donation of a kidney.
{ 4 } - a cornea transplant.
See p. 333. One can function well on one kidney.
<= back | menu | forward =>
4 is correct!
The authors do NOT think that loss of anatomical integrity for the sake of someone else's functional integrity justifies
{ 1 } - skin grafts.
{ 2 } - blood transfusions.
{ 3 } - donation of a kidney.
{ 4 } - a cornea transplant.
The loss of sight in one eye is a serious loss of functional integrity as well as anatomical integrity.
<= back | menu | forward =>
Before continuing, you might try some wrong answers.
the end