What is your answer?
With regard to organ donation from living persons, the authors hold:
{ 1 } - The courts should compel organ donation among family members.
{ 2 } - The serious risk may be justified by the fact that donors share in the common good of the community to which they contribute by helping one another, that is, by love.
{ 3 } - Organ donation is an obligation.
{ 4 } - There is little risk involved.
{ 5 } - Selling of organs is ethical.
<= back | menu | forward =>
Directions: Click on a number from 1 to 5.
1 is wrong. Please try again.
With regard to organ donation from living persons, the authors hold:
{ 1 } - The courts should compel organ donation among family members.
{ 2 } - The serious risk may be justified by the fact that donors share in the common good of the community to which they contribute by helping one another, that is, by love.
{ 3 } - Organ donation is an obligation.
{ 4 } - There is little risk involved.
{ 5 } - Selling of organs is ethical.
See p. 333.
<= back | menu | forward =>
2 is correct!
With regard to organ donation from living persons, the authors hold:
{ 1 } - The courts should compel organ donation among family members.
{ 2 } - The serious risk may be justified by the fact that donors share in the common good of the community to which they contribute by helping one another, that is, by love.
{ 3 } - Organ donation is an obligation.
{ 4 } - There is little risk involved.
{ 5 } - Selling of organs is ethical.
See p. 333.
<= back | menu | forward =>
Before continuing, you might try some wrong answers.
3 is wrong. Please try again.
With regard to organ donation from living persons, the authors hold:
{ 1 } - The courts should compel organ donation among family members.
{ 2 } - The serious risk may be justified by the fact that donors share in the common good of the community to which they contribute by helping one another, that is, by love.
{ 3 } - Organ donation is an obligation.
{ 4 } - There is little risk involved.
{ 5 } - Selling of organs is ethical.
No, it is something chosen in the freedom of charity. See p. 333.
<= back | menu | forward =>
4 is wrong. Please try again.
With regard to organ donation from living persons, the authors hold:
{ 1 } - The courts should compel organ donation among family members.
{ 2 } - The serious risk may be justified by the fact that donors share in the common good of the community to which they contribute by helping one another, that is, by love.
{ 3 } - Organ donation is an obligation.
{ 4 } - There is little risk involved.
{ 5 } - Selling of organs is ethical.
There is serious risk--besides the risk of surgery, donors take the risk of serious illness themselves if their remaining organ becomes diseased or damaged. See p. 333.
<= back | menu | forward =>
5 is wrong. Please try again.
With regard to organ donation from living persons, the authors hold:
{ 1 } - The courts should compel organ donation among family members.
{ 2 } - The serious risk may be justified by the fact that donors share in the common good of the community to which they contribute by helping one another, that is, by love.
{ 3 } - Organ donation is an obligation.
{ 4 } - There is little risk involved.
{ 5 } - Selling of organs is ethical.
No, because the only motivation that justifies organ donation is charity, and charity is priceless, selling of organs is unethical. See p. 333.
<= back | menu | forward =>
the end