What is your answer?
Which was a serious concern about organ transplants from deceased donors which has now diminished?
{ 1 } - The principle of totality and integrity should not be violated, even for corpses.
{ 2 } - There was fear that people would be killed for their organs.
{ 3 } - There was a great expense in money and personnel needed for heart transplants which were thought to bring little substantive value to human society in general.
{ 4 } - There was intuitive dissatisfaction with the mutilation of corpses.
<= back | menu | forward =>
Directions: Click on a number from 1 to 4.
1 is wrong. Please try again.
Which was a serious concern about organ transplants from deceased donors which has now diminished?
{ 1 } - The principle of totality and integrity should not be violated, even for corpses.
{ 2 } - There was fear that people would be killed for their organs.
{ 3 } - There was a great expense in money and personnel needed for heart transplants which were thought to bring little substantive value to human society in general.
{ 4 } - There was intuitive dissatisfaction with the mutilation of corpses.
A corpse, lacking a soul, has no more than a superficial, not a substantial, integrity.
<= back | menu | forward =>
2 is wrong. Please try again.
Which was a serious concern about organ transplants from deceased donors which has now diminished?
{ 1 } - The principle of totality and integrity should not be violated, even for corpses.
{ 2 } - There was fear that people would be killed for their organs.
{ 3 } - There was a great expense in money and personnel needed for heart transplants which were thought to bring little substantive value to human society in general.
{ 4 } - There was intuitive dissatisfaction with the mutilation of corpses.
There is some evidence that such killing takes place today, but the authors do not suggest this concern, nor that it has diminished..
<= back | menu | forward =>
3 is correct!
Which was a serious concern about organ transplants from deceased donors which has now diminished?
{ 1 } - The principle of totality and integrity should not be violated, even for corpses.
{ 2 } - There was fear that people would be killed for their organs.
{ 3 } - There was a great expense in money and personnel needed for heart transplants which were thought to bring little substantive value to human society in general.
{ 4 } - There was intuitive dissatisfaction with the mutilation of corpses.
Better survival rates in recipients of such transplants have diminished such concerns. See p. 331.
<= back | menu | forward =>
Before continuing, you might try some wrong answers.
4 is wrong. Please try again.
Which was a serious concern about organ transplants from deceased donors which has now diminished?
{ 1 } - The principle of totality and integrity should not be violated, even for corpses.
{ 2 } - There was fear that people would be killed for their organs.
{ 3 } - There was a great expense in money and personnel needed for heart transplants which were thought to bring little substantive value to human society in general.
{ 4 } - There was intuitive dissatisfaction with the mutilation of corpses.
<= back | menu | forward =>
the end