What is your answer?
The authors do NOT hold that:
{ 1 } - The right of a child to be free from preventable or correctable defects is protected by destroying the child who has not been saved from defect.
{ 2 } - Parents may not lighten their burden by destroying an unborn child any more than an infant or adolescent.
{ 3 } - Having generated defective children, parents have the responsibility to care for them.
{ 4 } - The basic conviction that it is better not to exist than to be a defective person is an assumption of some humanists, but is not consistent with a Christian view of the value of a person or the true meaning of human life.
{ 5 } - Parents may have the responsibility not to generate defective children.
{ 6 } - The genetic counselor has the function of helping prospective parents prepare themselves for the possibility that a fetus will be defective and to plan ways to provide for this eventuality.
{ 7 } - It is a right for a child to be free of every defect that medicine has the power to prevent or correct.
{ 8 } - The genetic counselor has the task of helping parents to decide whether they will or will not generate children.
<= back | menu | forward =>
Directions: Click on a number from 1 to 8.
1 is correct!
The authors do NOT hold that:
{ 1 } - The right of a child to be free from preventable or correctable defects is protected by destroying the child who has not been saved from defect.
{ 2 } - Parents may not lighten their burden by destroying an unborn child any more than an infant or adolescent.
{ 3 } - Having generated defective children, parents have the responsibility to care for them.
{ 4 } - The basic conviction that it is better not to exist than to be a defective person is an assumption of some humanists, but is not consistent with a Christian view of the value of a person or the true meaning of human life.
{ 5 } - Parents may have the responsibility not to generate defective children.
{ 6 } - The genetic counselor has the function of helping prospective parents prepare themselves for the possibility that a fetus will be defective and to plan ways to provide for this eventuality.
{ 7 } - It is a right for a child to be free of every defect that medicine has the power to prevent or correct.
{ 8 } - The genetic counselor has the task of helping parents to decide whether they will or will not generate children.
See p. 329.
<= back | menu | forward =>
Before continuing, you might try some wrong answers.
2 is wrong. Please try again.
The authors do NOT hold that:
{ 1 } - The right of a child to be free from preventable or correctable defects is protected by destroying the child who has not been saved from defect.
{ 2 } - Parents may not lighten their burden by destroying an unborn child any more than an infant or adolescent.
{ 3 } - Having generated defective children, parents have the responsibility to care for them.
{ 4 } - The basic conviction that it is better not to exist than to be a defective person is an assumption of some humanists, but is not consistent with a Christian view of the value of a person or the true meaning of human life.
{ 5 } - Parents may have the responsibility not to generate defective children.
{ 6 } - The genetic counselor has the function of helping prospective parents prepare themselves for the possibility that a fetus will be defective and to plan ways to provide for this eventuality.
{ 7 } - It is a right for a child to be free of every defect that medicine has the power to prevent or correct.
{ 8 } - The genetic counselor has the task of helping parents to decide whether they will or will not generate children.
See p. 329.
<= back | menu | forward =>
3 is wrong. Please try again.
The authors do NOT hold that:
{ 1 } - The right of a child to be free from preventable or correctable defects is protected by destroying the child who has not been saved from defect.
{ 2 } - Parents may not lighten their burden by destroying an unborn child any more than an infant or adolescent.
{ 3 } - Having generated defective children, parents have the responsibility to care for them.
{ 4 } - The basic conviction that it is better not to exist than to be a defective person is an assumption of some humanists, but is not consistent with a Christian view of the value of a person or the true meaning of human life.
{ 5 } - Parents may have the responsibility not to generate defective children.
{ 6 } - The genetic counselor has the function of helping prospective parents prepare themselves for the possibility that a fetus will be defective and to plan ways to provide for this eventuality.
{ 7 } - It is a right for a child to be free of every defect that medicine has the power to prevent or correct.
{ 8 } - The genetic counselor has the task of helping parents to decide whether they will or will not generate children.
See p. 329.
<= back | menu | forward =>
4 is wrong. Please try again.
The authors do NOT hold that:
{ 1 } - The right of a child to be free from preventable or correctable defects is protected by destroying the child who has not been saved from defect.
{ 2 } - Parents may not lighten their burden by destroying an unborn child any more than an infant or adolescent.
{ 3 } - Having generated defective children, parents have the responsibility to care for them.
{ 4 } - The basic conviction that it is better not to exist than to be a defective person is an assumption of some humanists, but is not consistent with a Christian view of the value of a person or the true meaning of human life.
{ 5 } - Parents may have the responsibility not to generate defective children.
{ 6 } - The genetic counselor has the function of helping prospective parents prepare themselves for the possibility that a fetus will be defective and to plan ways to provide for this eventuality.
{ 7 } - It is a right for a child to be free of every defect that medicine has the power to prevent or correct.
{ 8 } - The genetic counselor has the task of helping parents to decide whether they will or will not generate children.
See p. 329.
<= back | menu | forward =>
5 is wrong. Please try again.
The authors do NOT hold that:
{ 1 } - The right of a child to be free from preventable or correctable defects is protected by destroying the child who has not been saved from defect.
{ 2 } - Parents may not lighten their burden by destroying an unborn child any more than an infant or adolescent.
{ 3 } - Having generated defective children, parents have the responsibility to care for them.
{ 4 } - The basic conviction that it is better not to exist than to be a defective person is an assumption of some humanists, but is not consistent with a Christian view of the value of a person or the true meaning of human life.
{ 5 } - Parents may have the responsibility not to generate defective children.
{ 6 } - The genetic counselor has the function of helping prospective parents prepare themselves for the possibility that a fetus will be defective and to plan ways to provide for this eventuality.
{ 7 } - It is a right for a child to be free of every defect that medicine has the power to prevent or correct.
{ 8 } - The genetic counselor has the task of helping parents to decide whether they will or will not generate children.
See p. 329.
<= back | menu | forward =>
6 is wrong. Please try again.
The authors do NOT hold that:
{ 1 } - The right of a child to be free from preventable or correctable defects is protected by destroying the child who has not been saved from defect.
{ 2 } - Parents may not lighten their burden by destroying an unborn child any more than an infant or adolescent.
{ 3 } - Having generated defective children, parents have the responsibility to care for them.
{ 4 } - The basic conviction that it is better not to exist than to be a defective person is an assumption of some humanists, but is not consistent with a Christian view of the value of a person or the true meaning of human life.
{ 5 } - Parents may have the responsibility not to generate defective children.
{ 6 } - The genetic counselor has the function of helping prospective parents prepare themselves for the possibility that a fetus will be defective and to plan ways to provide for this eventuality.
{ 7 } - It is a right for a child to be free of every defect that medicine has the power to prevent or correct.
{ 8 } - The genetic counselor has the task of helping parents to decide whether they will or will not generate children.
See p. 329.
<= back | menu | forward =>
7 is wrong. Please try again.
The authors do NOT hold that:
{ 1 } - The right of a child to be free from preventable or correctable defects is protected by destroying the child who has not been saved from defect.
{ 2 } - Parents may not lighten their burden by destroying an unborn child any more than an infant or adolescent.
{ 3 } - Having generated defective children, parents have the responsibility to care for them.
{ 4 } - The basic conviction that it is better not to exist than to be a defective person is an assumption of some humanists, but is not consistent with a Christian view of the value of a person or the true meaning of human life.
{ 5 } - Parents may have the responsibility not to generate defective children.
{ 6 } - The genetic counselor has the function of helping prospective parents prepare themselves for the possibility that a fetus will be defective and to plan ways to provide for this eventuality.
{ 7 } - It is a right for a child to be free of every defect that medicine has the power to prevent or correct.
{ 8 } - The genetic counselor has the task of helping parents to decide whether they will or will not generate children.
See p. 329.
<= back | menu | forward =>
8 is wrong. Please try again.
The authors do NOT hold that:
{ 1 } - The right of a child to be free from preventable or correctable defects is protected by destroying the child who has not been saved from defect.
{ 2 } - Parents may not lighten their burden by destroying an unborn child any more than an infant or adolescent.
{ 3 } - Having generated defective children, parents have the responsibility to care for them.
{ 4 } - The basic conviction that it is better not to exist than to be a defective person is an assumption of some humanists, but is not consistent with a Christian view of the value of a person or the true meaning of human life.
{ 5 } - Parents may have the responsibility not to generate defective children.
{ 6 } - The genetic counselor has the function of helping prospective parents prepare themselves for the possibility that a fetus will be defective and to plan ways to provide for this eventuality.
{ 7 } - It is a right for a child to be free of every defect that medicine has the power to prevent or correct.
{ 8 } - The genetic counselor has the task of helping parents to decide whether they will or will not generate children.
See p. 329.
<= back | menu | forward =>
the end