What is your answer?
Which is a reason our individualistic culture would give to support the position that genital acts outside a permanent heterosexual marriage open to procreation are not objectively serious moral evils (sins)?
{ 1 } - Such acts have public effects.
{ 2 } - Such acts fulfil God's intention for them of expressing intimate committed love and share in God's creation of new persons in that context.
{ 3 } - Such acts often transmit venereal disease.
{ 4 } - Such acts undermine family life.
{ 5 } - Such acts distort the integrity of personal character.
{ 6 } - Such acts are private, and have no necessary connection to love, the human community, and God.
<= back | menu | forward =>
Directions: Click on a number from 1 to 6.
1 is wrong. Please try again.
Which is a reason our individualistic culture would give to support the position that genital acts outside a permanent heterosexual marriage open to procreation are not objectively serious moral evils (sins)?
{ 1 } - Such acts have public effects.
{ 2 } - Such acts fulfil God's intention for them of expressing intimate committed love and share in God's creation of new persons in that context.
{ 3 } - Such acts often transmit venereal disease.
{ 4 } - Such acts undermine family life.
{ 5 } - Such acts distort the integrity of personal character.
{ 6 } - Such acts are private, and have no necessary connection to love, the human community, and God.
See p. 309.
<= back | menu | forward =>
2 is wrong. Please try again.
Which is a reason our individualistic culture would give to support the position that genital acts outside a permanent heterosexual marriage open to procreation are not objectively serious moral evils (sins)?
{ 1 } - Such acts have public effects.
{ 2 } - Such acts fulfil God's intention for them of expressing intimate committed love and share in God's creation of new persons in that context.
{ 3 } - Such acts often transmit venereal disease.
{ 4 } - Such acts undermine family life.
{ 5 } - Such acts distort the integrity of personal character.
{ 6 } - Such acts are private, and have no necessary connection to love, the human community, and God.
See p. 309.
<= back | menu | forward =>
3 is wrong. Please try again.
Which is a reason our individualistic culture would give to support the position that genital acts outside a permanent heterosexual marriage open to procreation are not objectively serious moral evils (sins)?
{ 1 } - Such acts have public effects.
{ 2 } - Such acts fulfil God's intention for them of expressing intimate committed love and share in God's creation of new persons in that context.
{ 3 } - Such acts often transmit venereal disease.
{ 4 } - Such acts undermine family life.
{ 5 } - Such acts distort the integrity of personal character.
{ 6 } - Such acts are private, and have no necessary connection to love, the human community, and God.
See p. 309.
<= back | menu | forward =>
4 is wrong. Please try again.
Which is a reason our individualistic culture would give to support the position that genital acts outside a permanent heterosexual marriage open to procreation are not objectively serious moral evils (sins)?
{ 1 } - Such acts have public effects.
{ 2 } - Such acts fulfil God's intention for them of expressing intimate committed love and share in God's creation of new persons in that context.
{ 3 } - Such acts often transmit venereal disease.
{ 4 } - Such acts undermine family life.
{ 5 } - Such acts distort the integrity of personal character.
{ 6 } - Such acts are private, and have no necessary connection to love, the human community, and God.
See p. 309.
<= back | menu | forward =>
5 is wrong. Please try again.
Which is a reason our individualistic culture would give to support the position that genital acts outside a permanent heterosexual marriage open to procreation are not objectively serious moral evils (sins)?
{ 1 } - Such acts have public effects.
{ 2 } - Such acts fulfil God's intention for them of expressing intimate committed love and share in God's creation of new persons in that context.
{ 3 } - Such acts often transmit venereal disease.
{ 4 } - Such acts undermine family life.
{ 5 } - Such acts distort the integrity of personal character.
{ 6 } - Such acts are private, and have no necessary connection to love, the human community, and God.
See p. 309.
<= back | menu | forward =>
6 is correct!
Which is a reason our individualistic culture would give to support the position that genital acts outside a permanent heterosexual marriage open to procreation are not objectively serious moral evils (sins)?
{ 1 } - Such acts have public effects.
{ 2 } - Such acts fulfil God's intention for them of expressing intimate committed love and share in God's creation of new persons in that context.
{ 3 } - Such acts often transmit venereal disease.
{ 4 } - Such acts undermine family life.
{ 5 } - Such acts distort the integrity of personal character.
{ 6 } - Such acts are private, and have no necessary connection to love, the human community, and God.
See p. 309.
<= back | menu | forward =>
Before continuing, you might try some wrong answers.
the end