What is your answer?
Which position do the authors NOT hold?
{ 1 } - Human reason tells us that the teleology of the human sexual act has both unitive and procreative functions best fulfilled in the permanent, monogamous family, and that these values are morally inseparable and support for them is essential for a good society.
{ 2 } - Many Catholic theologians found that once they had accepted contraception they were logically forced to accept, at least in some circumstances, masturbation, homosexual acts, and extramarital sexual intercourse.
{ 3 } - The Old Testament in Genesis 1-2 makes clear that God created us as sexual beings in view of marriage, which has both unitive and procreative purposes so related as to be morally inseparable.
{ 4 } - The principle of stewardship and creativity allows one to change the natural teleology of the sexual act by technology such as the use of progesterones to deliberately render fertile acts infertile, as long as this is done in marriage and for a proportionately good reason.
{ 5 } - The tradition of the Catholic Church has consistently opposed contraception as contrary to the will of the Creator revealed in the Scriptures and the natural law.
{ 6 } - Jesus taught that marriage is a monogamous and permanent covenant.
{ 7 } - Practices that deliberately render fertile genital acts infertile are contrary to natural moral law and intrinsically evil no matter what the circumstances or purposes for which they are performed.
<= back | menu | forward =>
Directions: Click on a number from 1 to 7.
1 is wrong. Please try again.
Which position do the authors NOT hold?
{ 1 } - Human reason tells us that the teleology of the human sexual act has both unitive and procreative functions best fulfilled in the permanent, monogamous family, and that these values are morally inseparable and support for them is essential for a good society.
{ 2 } - Many Catholic theologians found that once they had accepted contraception they were logically forced to accept, at least in some circumstances, masturbation, homosexual acts, and extramarital sexual intercourse.
{ 3 } - The Old Testament in Genesis 1-2 makes clear that God created us as sexual beings in view of marriage, which has both unitive and procreative purposes so related as to be morally inseparable.
{ 4 } - The principle of stewardship and creativity allows one to change the natural teleology of the sexual act by technology such as the use of progesterones to deliberately render fertile acts infertile, as long as this is done in marriage and for a proportionately good reason.
{ 5 } - The tradition of the Catholic Church has consistently opposed contraception as contrary to the will of the Creator revealed in the Scriptures and the natural law.
{ 6 } - Jesus taught that marriage is a monogamous and permanent covenant.
{ 7 } - Practices that deliberately render fertile genital acts infertile are contrary to natural moral law and intrinsically evil no matter what the circumstances or purposes for which they are performed.
See p. 287.
<= back | menu | forward =>
2 is wrong. Please try again.
Which position do the authors NOT hold?
{ 1 } - Human reason tells us that the teleology of the human sexual act has both unitive and procreative functions best fulfilled in the permanent, monogamous family, and that these values are morally inseparable and support for them is essential for a good society.
{ 2 } - Many Catholic theologians found that once they had accepted contraception they were logically forced to accept, at least in some circumstances, masturbation, homosexual acts, and extramarital sexual intercourse.
{ 3 } - The Old Testament in Genesis 1-2 makes clear that God created us as sexual beings in view of marriage, which has both unitive and procreative purposes so related as to be morally inseparable.
{ 4 } - The principle of stewardship and creativity allows one to change the natural teleology of the sexual act by technology such as the use of progesterones to deliberately render fertile acts infertile, as long as this is done in marriage and for a proportionately good reason.
{ 5 } - The tradition of the Catholic Church has consistently opposed contraception as contrary to the will of the Creator revealed in the Scriptures and the natural law.
{ 6 } - Jesus taught that marriage is a monogamous and permanent covenant.
{ 7 } - Practices that deliberately render fertile genital acts infertile are contrary to natural moral law and intrinsically evil no matter what the circumstances or purposes for which they are performed.
=
<= back | menu | forward =>
3 is wrong. Please try again.
Which position do the authors NOT hold?
{ 1 } - Human reason tells us that the teleology of the human sexual act has both unitive and procreative functions best fulfilled in the permanent, monogamous family, and that these values are morally inseparable and support for them is essential for a good society.
{ 2 } - Many Catholic theologians found that once they had accepted contraception they were logically forced to accept, at least in some circumstances, masturbation, homosexual acts, and extramarital sexual intercourse.
{ 3 } - The Old Testament in Genesis 1-2 makes clear that God created us as sexual beings in view of marriage, which has both unitive and procreative purposes so related as to be morally inseparable.
{ 4 } - The principle of stewardship and creativity allows one to change the natural teleology of the sexual act by technology such as the use of progesterones to deliberately render fertile acts infertile, as long as this is done in marriage and for a proportionately good reason.
{ 5 } - The tradition of the Catholic Church has consistently opposed contraception as contrary to the will of the Creator revealed in the Scriptures and the natural law.
{ 6 } - Jesus taught that marriage is a monogamous and permanent covenant.
{ 7 } - Practices that deliberately render fertile genital acts infertile are contrary to natural moral law and intrinsically evil no matter what the circumstances or purposes for which they are performed.
See p. 286
<= back | menu | forward =>
4 is correct!
Which position do the authors NOT hold?
{ 1 } - Human reason tells us that the teleology of the human sexual act has both unitive and procreative functions best fulfilled in the permanent, monogamous family, and that these values are morally inseparable and support for them is essential for a good society.
{ 2 } - Many Catholic theologians found that once they had accepted contraception they were logically forced to accept, at least in some circumstances, masturbation, homosexual acts, and extramarital sexual intercourse.
{ 3 } - The Old Testament in Genesis 1-2 makes clear that God created us as sexual beings in view of marriage, which has both unitive and procreative purposes so related as to be morally inseparable.
{ 4 } - The principle of stewardship and creativity allows one to change the natural teleology of the sexual act by technology such as the use of progesterones to deliberately render fertile acts infertile, as long as this is done in marriage and for a proportionately good reason.
{ 5 } - The tradition of the Catholic Church has consistently opposed contraception as contrary to the will of the Creator revealed in the Scriptures and the natural law.
{ 6 } - Jesus taught that marriage is a monogamous and permanent covenant.
{ 7 } - Practices that deliberately render fertile genital acts infertile are contrary to natural moral law and intrinsically evil no matter what the circumstances or purposes for which they are performed.
The authors hold that such contraception is intrinsically evil. See p. 287.
<= back | menu | forward =>
Before continuing, you might try some wrong answers.
5 is wrong. Please try again.
Which position do the authors NOT hold?
{ 1 } - Human reason tells us that the teleology of the human sexual act has both unitive and procreative functions best fulfilled in the permanent, monogamous family, and that these values are morally inseparable and support for them is essential for a good society.
{ 2 } - Many Catholic theologians found that once they had accepted contraception they were logically forced to accept, at least in some circumstances, masturbation, homosexual acts, and extramarital sexual intercourse.
{ 3 } - The Old Testament in Genesis 1-2 makes clear that God created us as sexual beings in view of marriage, which has both unitive and procreative purposes so related as to be morally inseparable.
{ 4 } - The principle of stewardship and creativity allows one to change the natural teleology of the sexual act by technology such as the use of progesterones to deliberately render fertile acts infertile, as long as this is done in marriage and for a proportionately good reason.
{ 5 } - The tradition of the Catholic Church has consistently opposed contraception as contrary to the will of the Creator revealed in the Scriptures and the natural law.
{ 6 } - Jesus taught that marriage is a monogamous and permanent covenant.
{ 7 } - Practices that deliberately render fertile genital acts infertile are contrary to natural moral law and intrinsically evil no matter what the circumstances or purposes for which they are performed.
See p. 287.
<= back | menu | forward =>
6 is wrong. Please try again.
Which position do the authors NOT hold?
{ 1 } - Human reason tells us that the teleology of the human sexual act has both unitive and procreative functions best fulfilled in the permanent, monogamous family, and that these values are morally inseparable and support for them is essential for a good society.
{ 2 } - Many Catholic theologians found that once they had accepted contraception they were logically forced to accept, at least in some circumstances, masturbation, homosexual acts, and extramarital sexual intercourse.
{ 3 } - The Old Testament in Genesis 1-2 makes clear that God created us as sexual beings in view of marriage, which has both unitive and procreative purposes so related as to be morally inseparable.
{ 4 } - The principle of stewardship and creativity allows one to change the natural teleology of the sexual act by technology such as the use of progesterones to deliberately render fertile acts infertile, as long as this is done in marriage and for a proportionately good reason.
{ 5 } - The tradition of the Catholic Church has consistently opposed contraception as contrary to the will of the Creator revealed in the Scriptures and the natural law.
{ 6 } - Jesus taught that marriage is a monogamous and permanent covenant.
{ 7 } - Practices that deliberately render fertile genital acts infertile are contrary to natural moral law and intrinsically evil no matter what the circumstances or purposes for which they are performed.
See p. 287.
<= back | menu | forward =>
7 is wrong. Please try again.
Which position do the authors NOT hold?
{ 1 } - Human reason tells us that the teleology of the human sexual act has both unitive and procreative functions best fulfilled in the permanent, monogamous family, and that these values are morally inseparable and support for them is essential for a good society.
{ 2 } - Many Catholic theologians found that once they had accepted contraception they were logically forced to accept, at least in some circumstances, masturbation, homosexual acts, and extramarital sexual intercourse.
{ 3 } - The Old Testament in Genesis 1-2 makes clear that God created us as sexual beings in view of marriage, which has both unitive and procreative purposes so related as to be morally inseparable.
{ 4 } - The principle of stewardship and creativity allows one to change the natural teleology of the sexual act by technology such as the use of progesterones to deliberately render fertile acts infertile, as long as this is done in marriage and for a proportionately good reason.
{ 5 } - The tradition of the Catholic Church has consistently opposed contraception as contrary to the will of the Creator revealed in the Scriptures and the natural law.
{ 6 } - Jesus taught that marriage is a monogamous and permanent covenant.
{ 7 } - Practices that deliberately render fertile genital acts infertile are contrary to natural moral law and intrinsically evil no matter what the circumstances or purposes for which they are performed.
See p. 287.
<= back | menu | forward =>
the end