What is your answer?

Engelhardt does NOT hold that

    { 1 } - there are good reasons to treat infants as persons.
    { 2 } - seriously defective children are not persons.
    { 3 } - there are good reasons not to treat unborn humans as persons.
    { 4 } - infants are not persons.
    { 5 } - all humans are persons.

<= back | menu | forward =>
Directions: Click on a number from 1 to 5.
























 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

























1 is wrong. Please try again.

Engelhardt does NOT hold that

See p. 237-8.

<= back | menu | forward =>
























 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

























2 is wrong. Please try again.

Engelhardt does NOT hold that

    { 1 } - there are good reasons to treat infants as persons.
    { 2 } - seriously defective children are not persons.
    { 3 } - there are good reasons not to treat unborn humans as persons.
    { 4 } - infants are not persons.
    { 5 } - all humans are persons.

See p. 237-8.

<= back | menu | forward =>
























 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

























3 is wrong. Please try again.

Engelhardt does NOT hold that

    { 1 } - there are good reasons to treat infants as persons.
    { 2 } - seriously defective children are not persons.
    { 3 } - there are good reasons not to treat unborn humans as persons.
    { 4 } - infants are not persons.
    { 5 } - all humans are persons.

See p. 237-8.

<= back | menu | forward =>
























 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

























4 is wrong. Please try again.

Engelhardt does NOT hold that

    { 1 } - there are good reasons to treat infants as persons.
    { 2 } - seriously defective children are not persons.
    { 3 } - there are good reasons not to treat unborn humans as persons.
    { 4 } - infants are not persons.
    { 5 } - all humans are persons.

See p. 237-8.

<= back | menu | forward =>
























 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

























5 is correct!

Engelhardt does NOT hold that

    { 1 } - there are good reasons to treat infants as persons.
    { 2 } - seriously defective children are not persons.
    { 3 } - there are good reasons not to treat unborn humans as persons.
    { 4 } - infants are not persons.
    { 5 } - all humans are persons.

See p. 237-8.

<= back | menu | forward =>
Before continuing, you might try some wrong answers.
























 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

























the end