What is your answer?

The authors believe that immediate material cooperation in an intrinsically evil action may be moral when duress exists, for example, that it would be moral to help perform the action of abortion if one would lose one's job if one did not help.

<= back | menu | forward =>
Directions: Click on a number from 1 to 2.
























 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

























1 is wrong. Please try again.

The authors believe that immediate material cooperation in an intrinsically evil action may be moral when duress exists, for example, that it would be moral to help perform the action of abortion if one would lose one's job if one did not help.

See p. 197. The authors think that immediate material cooperation in an intrinsically evil act is never justified.

<= back | menu | forward =>
























 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

























2 is correct!

The authors believe that immediate material cooperation in an intrinsically evil action may be moral when duress exists, for example, that it would be moral to help perform the action of abortion if one would lose one's job if one did not help.

See p. 197. The authors think that immediate material cooperation in an intrinsically evil act is never justified.

<= back | menu | forward =>
Before continuing, you might try some wrong answers.
























 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

























the end