What is your answer?
Those who think that the moral object essentially specifies the moral act think that
{ 1 } - the nature of the human self is unknowable.
{ 2 } - their ethics is based on the self-conscious phenomenological "subject."
{ 3 } - morality consists in the relation of the act as means to the true goals of human life which are grounded in human nature.
{ 4 } - there are no grounds for assigning a priority to the moral object of a human act over circumstances and circumstantial intentions.
{ 5 } - it is impossible to categorically declare that any concrete moral norms, even negative ones, are absolute.
<= back | menu | forward =>
Directions: Click on a number from 1 to 5.
1 is wrong. Please try again.
Those who think that the moral object essentially specifies the moral act think that
{ 1 } - the nature of the human self is unknowable.
{ 2 } - their ethics is based on the self-conscious phenomenological "subject."
{ 3 } - morality consists in the relation of the act as means to the true goals of human life which are grounded in human nature.
{ 4 } - there are no grounds for assigning a priority to the moral object of a human act over circumstances and circumstantial intentions.
{ 5 } - it is impossible to categorically declare that any concrete moral norms, even negative ones, are absolute.
No, Kant and the proportionalists think that. See p. 162.
<= back | menu | forward =>
2 is wrong. Please try again.
Those who think that the moral object essentially specifies the moral act think that
{ 1 } - the nature of the human self is unknowable.
{ 2 } - their ethics is based on the self-conscious phenomenological "subject."
{ 3 } - morality consists in the relation of the act as means to the true goals of human life which are grounded in human nature.
{ 4 } - there are no grounds for assigning a priority to the moral object of a human act over circumstances and circumstantial intentions.
{ 5 } - it is impossible to categorically declare that any concrete moral norms, even negative ones, are absolute.
See p. 162.
<= back | menu | forward =>
3 is correct!
Those who think that the moral object essentially specifies the moral act think that
{ 1 } - the nature of the human self is unknowable.
{ 2 } - their ethics is based on the self-conscious phenomenological "subject."
{ 3 } - morality consists in the relation of the act as means to the true goals of human life which are grounded in human nature.
{ 4 } - there are no grounds for assigning a priority to the moral object of a human act over circumstances and circumstantial intentions.
{ 5 } - it is impossible to categorically declare that any concrete moral norms, even negative ones, are absolute.
See p. 162.
<= back | menu | forward =>
Before continuing, you might try some wrong answers.
4 is wrong. Please try again.
Those who think that the moral object essentially specifies the moral act think that
{ 1 } - the nature of the human self is unknowable.
{ 2 } - their ethics is based on the self-conscious phenomenological "subject."
{ 3 } - morality consists in the relation of the act as means to the true goals of human life which are grounded in human nature.
{ 4 } - there are no grounds for assigning a priority to the moral object of a human act over circumstances and circumstantial intentions.
{ 5 } - it is impossible to categorically declare that any concrete moral norms, even negative ones, are absolute.
See p. 162.
<= back | menu | forward =>
5 is wrong. Please try again.
Those who think that the moral object essentially specifies the moral act think that
{ 1 } - the nature of the human self is unknowable.
{ 2 } - their ethics is based on the self-conscious phenomenological "subject."
{ 3 } - morality consists in the relation of the act as means to the true goals of human life which are grounded in human nature.
{ 4 } - there are no grounds for assigning a priority to the moral object of a human act over circumstances and circumstantial intentions.
{ 5 } - it is impossible to categorically declare that any concrete moral norms, even negative ones, are absolute.
No, the proportionalists think that.
<= back | menu | forward =>
the end