What is your answer?
Unlike Karl Rahner, some of his followers hold that
{ 1 } - we can change transcendental commitment only by a categorical act.
{ 2 } - the fundamental option pertains to the transcendental and not the categorical level of moral life.
{ 3 } - one can perform an act that is seriously immoral at the categorical level, while remaining committed to God at the transcendental level.
<= back | menu | forward =>
Directions: Click on a number from 1 to 3.
1 is wrong. Please try again.
Unlike Karl Rahner, some of his followers hold that
{ 1 } - we can change transcendental commitment only by a categorical act.
{ 2 } - the fundamental option pertains to the transcendental and not the categorical level of moral life.
{ 3 } - one can perform an act that is seriously immoral at the categorical level, while remaining committed to God at the transcendental level.
Rahner holds this. See p. 165.
<= back | menu | forward =>
2 is wrong. Please try again.
Unlike Karl Rahner, some of his followers hold that
{ 1 } - we can change transcendental commitment only by a categorical act.
{ 2 } - the fundamental option pertains to the transcendental and not the categorical level of moral life.
{ 3 } - one can perform an act that is seriously immoral at the categorical level, while remaining committed to God at the transcendental level.
Both hold this. See p. 165.
<= back | menu | forward =>
3 is correct!
Unlike Karl Rahner, some of his followers hold that
{ 1 } - we can change transcendental commitment only by a categorical act.
{ 2 } - the fundamental option pertains to the transcendental and not the categorical level of moral life.
{ 3 } - one can perform an act that is seriously immoral at the categorical level, while remaining committed to God at the transcendental level.
See p. 165. Neither Rahner nor Veritatis Splendor holds this position which would indicate a schizoid dualism in the human person.
<= back | menu | forward =>
Before continuing, you might try some wrong answers.
the end