What is your answer?
Which is NOT a problem with Beauchamp and Childress' system of "common morality?"
{ 1 } - It does not provide nonarbitrary concrete rules.
{ 2 } - It does not help us settle ethical questions in a consistent way, acceptable to our culture at the present time.
{ 3 } - It gives no objective, transcultural criteria for what makes behavior good except universalizability, i.e., common or customary morality.
{ 4 } - Consistent behavior does not always mean consistently good behavior.
<= back | menu | forward =>
Directions: Click on a number from 1 to 4.
1 is wrong. Please try again.
Which is NOT a problem with Beauchamp and Childress' system of "common morality?"
{ 1 } - It does not provide nonarbitrary concrete rules.
{ 2 } - It does not help us settle ethical questions in a consistent way, acceptable to our culture at the present time.
{ 3 } - It gives no objective, transcultural criteria for what makes behavior good except universalizability, i.e., common or customary morality.
{ 4 } - Consistent behavior does not always mean consistently good behavior.
See p. 155.
<= back | menu | forward =>
2 is correct!
Which is NOT a problem with Beauchamp and Childress' system of "common morality?"
{ 1 } - It does not provide nonarbitrary concrete rules.
{ 2 } - It does not help us settle ethical questions in a consistent way, acceptable to our culture at the present time.
{ 3 } - It gives no objective, transcultural criteria for what makes behavior good except universalizability, i.e., common or customary morality.
{ 4 } - Consistent behavior does not always mean consistently good behavior.
Yes, it does. See p. 155.
<= back | menu | forward =>
Before continuing, you might try some wrong answers.
3 is wrong. Please try again.
Which is NOT a problem with Beauchamp and Childress' system of "common morality?"
{ 1 } - It does not provide nonarbitrary concrete rules.
{ 2 } - It does not help us settle ethical questions in a consistent way, acceptable to our culture at the present time.
{ 3 } - It gives no objective, transcultural criteria for what makes behavior good except universalizability, i.e., common or customary morality.
{ 4 } - Consistent behavior does not always mean consistently good behavior.
See p. 155.
<= back | menu | forward =>
4 is wrong. Please try again.
Which is NOT a problem with Beauchamp and Childress' system of "common morality?"
{ 1 } - It does not provide nonarbitrary concrete rules.
{ 2 } - It does not help us settle ethical questions in a consistent way, acceptable to our culture at the present time.
{ 3 } - It gives no objective, transcultural criteria for what makes behavior good except universalizability, i.e., common or customary morality.
{ 4 } - Consistent behavior does not always mean consistently good behavior.
See p. 155.
<= back | menu | forward =>
the end