What is your answer?
The authors do NOT accept religious legalism because
{ 1 } - Having given us intelligence and freedom, God wants us to understand His wise purposes and freely carry them out.
{ 2 } - after the fall of Adam into sin, we have been blinded to moral truth by our self-righteousness.
{ 3 } - we can know only the will of God but cannot understand it as reasonable.
{ 4 } - God's will is arbitrary.
<= back | menu | forward =>
Directions: Click on a number from 1 to 4.
1 is correct!
The authors do NOT accept religious legalism because
{ 1 } - Having given us intelligence and freedom, God wants us to understand His wise purposes and freely carry them out.
{ 2 } - after the fall of Adam into sin, we have been blinded to moral truth by our self-righteousness.
{ 3 } - we can know only the will of God but cannot understand it as reasonable.
{ 4 } - God's will is arbitrary.
See p. 152.
<= back | menu | forward =>
Before continuing, you might try some wrong answers.
2 is wrong. Please try again.
The authors do NOT accept religious legalism because
{ 1 } - Having given us intelligence and freedom, God wants us to understand His wise purposes and freely carry them out.
{ 2 } - after the fall of Adam into sin, we have been blinded to moral truth by our self-righteousness.
{ 3 } - we can know only the will of God but cannot understand it as reasonable.
{ 4 } - God's will is arbitrary.
This is a position that supports religious legalism, and the authors don't think we are completely blinded to moral truth. See p. 152.
<= back | menu | forward =>
3 is wrong. Please try again.
The authors do NOT accept religious legalism because
{ 1 } - Having given us intelligence and freedom, God wants us to understand His wise purposes and freely carry them out.
{ 2 } - after the fall of Adam into sin, we have been blinded to moral truth by our self-righteousness.
{ 3 } - we can know only the will of God but cannot understand it as reasonable.
{ 4 } - God's will is arbitrary.
This is a position that supports religious legalism, and the authors don't think we are completely unaware of the reasonableness of God's will. See p. 152.
<= back | menu | forward =>
4 is wrong. Please try again.
The authors do NOT accept religious legalism because
{ 1 } - Having given us intelligence and freedom, God wants us to understand His wise purposes and freely carry them out.
{ 2 } - after the fall of Adam into sin, we have been blinded to moral truth by our self-righteousness.
{ 3 } - we can know only the will of God but cannot understand it as reasonable.
{ 4 } - God's will is arbitrary.
If it were, that fact would support religious legalism, but the authors don't believe that it is. See p. 152.
<= back | menu | forward =>
the end