What is your answer?
An increase in medical specialization and decline of the general practitioner
{ 1 } - will certainly not be reversed by managed health care.
{ 2 } - is not the result of decisions of physicians themselves.
{ 3 } - is not motivated by interest, convenience, prestige, or profit of the physician.
{ 4 } - has not taken place between 1950 and 1996.
{ 5 } - has not deprived patients of the advantage of having health problems evaluated by someone who thinks of the patient as a whole person with a continuous biography.
{ 6 } - is not clearly related to patient need.
<= back | menu | forward =>
Directions: Click on a number from 1 to 6.
1 is wrong. Please try again.
An increase in medical specialization and decline of the general practitioner
{ 1 } - will certainly not be reversed by managed health care.
{ 2 } - is not the result of decisions of physicians themselves.
{ 3 } - is not motivated by interest, convenience, prestige, or profit of the physician.
{ 4 } - has not taken place between 1950 and 1996.
{ 5 } - has not deprived patients of the advantage of having health problems evaluated by someone who thinks of the patient as a whole person with a continuous biography.
{ 6 } - is not clearly related to patient need.
See p. 129.
<= back | menu | forward =>
2 is wrong. Please try again.
An increase in medical specialization and decline of the general practitioner
{ 1 } - will certainly not be reversed by managed health care.
{ 2 } - is not the result of decisions of physicians themselves.
{ 3 } - is not motivated by interest, convenience, prestige, or profit of the physician.
{ 4 } - has not taken place between 1950 and 1996.
{ 5 } - has not deprived patients of the advantage of having health problems evaluated by someone who thinks of the patient as a whole person with a continuous biography.
{ 6 } - is not clearly related to patient need.
See p. 129.
<= back | menu | forward =>
3 is wrong. Please try again.
An increase in medical specialization and decline of the general practitioner
{ 1 } - will certainly not be reversed by managed health care.
{ 2 } - is not the result of decisions of physicians themselves.
{ 3 } - is not motivated by interest, convenience, prestige, or profit of the physician.
{ 4 } - has not taken place between 1950 and 1996.
{ 5 } - has not deprived patients of the advantage of having health problems evaluated by someone who thinks of the patient as a whole person with a continuous biography.
{ 6 } - is not clearly related to patient need.
See p. 129.
<= back | menu | forward =>
4 is wrong. Please try again.
An increase in medical specialization and decline of the general practitioner
{ 1 } - will certainly not be reversed by managed health care.
{ 2 } - is not the result of decisions of physicians themselves.
{ 3 } - is not motivated by interest, convenience, prestige, or profit of the physician.
{ 4 } - has not taken place between 1950 and 1996.
{ 5 } - has not deprived patients of the advantage of having health problems evaluated by someone who thinks of the patient as a whole person with a continuous biography.
{ 6 } - is not clearly related to patient need.
See p. 129.
<= back | menu | forward =>
5 is wrong. Please try again.
An increase in medical specialization and decline of the general practitioner
{ 1 } - will certainly not be reversed by managed health care.
{ 2 } - is not the result of decisions of physicians themselves.
{ 3 } - is not motivated by interest, convenience, prestige, or profit of the physician.
{ 4 } - has not taken place between 1950 and 1996.
{ 5 } - has not deprived patients of the advantage of having health problems evaluated by someone who thinks of the patient as a whole person with a continuous biography.
{ 6 } - is not clearly related to patient need.
See p. 129.
<= back | menu | forward =>
6 is correct!
An increase in medical specialization and decline of the general practitioner
{ 1 } - will certainly not be reversed by managed health care.
{ 2 } - is not the result of decisions of physicians themselves.
{ 3 } - is not motivated by interest, convenience, prestige, or profit of the physician.
{ 4 } - has not taken place between 1950 and 1996.
{ 5 } - has not deprived patients of the advantage of having health problems evaluated by someone who thinks of the patient as a whole person with a continuous biography.
{ 6 } - is not clearly related to patient need.
See p. 129.
<= back | menu | forward =>
Before continuing, you might try some wrong answers.
the end