What is your answer?
Which is NOT an observation by the authors on the federal commissions established to provide ethical guidelines for health care (CPHS, EAB, PCEMR)?
{ 1 } - Change in ethical and political attitudes in the United States may be discerned from the fact that although the first study group sought to develop a consensus founded upon natural law and shared religious beliefs, those sources of consensus are no longer acceptable.
{ 2 } - The fact that Congress recognizes the need for ethical norms in the field of research and therapy is a step forward.
{ 3 } - The norms formulated by the commissions are designed with our pluralistic society in mind and avoid controversy, so some of the more difficult and important ethical issues, such as when human life begins, are not considered.
{ 4 } - The basis on which the ethical statements are formulated is not the nature of the human person, physician-patient covenant, just society, or religious teaching, but what is culturally acceptable. Consequently, the conclusions are pragmatic and balance rights rather than defend them. Deciding ethical responsibilities in this manner is dangerous because it justifies whatever is popular.
{ 5 } - There is insufficient consideration of pressing ethical questions such as: Is there a right to equal health care for all and should all feasible care be financed publicly?
{ 6 } - Motivation for observing the norms of the federal commissions is not mainly monetary.
<= back | menu | forward =>
Directions: Click on a number from 1 to 6.
1 is wrong. Please try again.
Which is NOT an observation by the authors on the federal commissions established to provide ethical guidelines for health care (CPHS, EAB, PCEMR)?
{ 1 } - Change in ethical and political attitudes in the United States may be discerned from the fact that although the first study group sought to develop a consensus founded upon natural law and shared religious beliefs, those sources of consensus are no longer acceptable.
{ 2 } - The fact that Congress recognizes the need for ethical norms in the field of research and therapy is a step forward.
{ 3 } - The norms formulated by the commissions are designed with our pluralistic society in mind and avoid controversy, so some of the more difficult and important ethical issues, such as when human life begins, are not considered.
{ 4 } - The basis on which the ethical statements are formulated is not the nature of the human person, physician-patient covenant, just society, or religious teaching, but what is culturally acceptable. Consequently, the conclusions are pragmatic and balance rights rather than defend them. Deciding ethical responsibilities in this manner is dangerous because it justifies whatever is popular.
{ 5 } - There is insufficient consideration of pressing ethical questions such as: Is there a right to equal health care for all and should all feasible care be financed publicly?
{ 6 } - Motivation for observing the norms of the federal commissions is not mainly monetary.
See p. 122.
<= back | menu | forward =>
2 is wrong. Please try again.
Which is NOT an observation by the authors on the federal commissions established to provide ethical guidelines for health care (CPHS, EAB, PCEMR)?
{ 1 } - Change in ethical and political attitudes in the United States may be discerned from the fact that although the first study group sought to develop a consensus founded upon natural law and shared religious beliefs, those sources of consensus are no longer acceptable.
{ 2 } - The fact that Congress recognizes the need for ethical norms in the field of research and therapy is a step forward.
{ 3 } - The norms formulated by the commissions are designed with our pluralistic society in mind and avoid controversy, so some of the more difficult and important ethical issues, such as when human life begins, are not considered.
{ 4 } - The basis on which the ethical statements are formulated is not the nature of the human person, physician-patient covenant, just society, or religious teaching, but what is culturally acceptable. Consequently, the conclusions are pragmatic and balance rights rather than defend them. Deciding ethical responsibilities in this manner is dangerous because it justifies whatever is popular.
{ 5 } - There is insufficient consideration of pressing ethical questions such as: Is there a right to equal health care for all and should all feasible care be financed publicly?
{ 6 } - Motivation for observing the norms of the federal commissions is not mainly monetary.
See p. 121.
<= back | menu | forward =>
3 is wrong. Please try again.
Which is NOT an observation by the authors on the federal commissions established to provide ethical guidelines for health care (CPHS, EAB, PCEMR)?
{ 1 } - Change in ethical and political attitudes in the United States may be discerned from the fact that although the first study group sought to develop a consensus founded upon natural law and shared religious beliefs, those sources of consensus are no longer acceptable.
{ 2 } - The fact that Congress recognizes the need for ethical norms in the field of research and therapy is a step forward.
{ 3 } - The norms formulated by the commissions are designed with our pluralistic society in mind and avoid controversy, so some of the more difficult and important ethical issues, such as when human life begins, are not considered.
{ 4 } - The basis on which the ethical statements are formulated is not the nature of the human person, physician-patient covenant, just society, or religious teaching, but what is culturally acceptable. Consequently, the conclusions are pragmatic and balance rights rather than defend them. Deciding ethical responsibilities in this manner is dangerous because it justifies whatever is popular.
{ 5 } - There is insufficient consideration of pressing ethical questions such as: Is there a right to equal health care for all and should all feasible care be financed publicly?
{ 6 } - Motivation for observing the norms of the federal commissions is not mainly monetary.
See p. 122.
<= back | menu | forward =>
4 is wrong. Please try again.
Which is NOT an observation by the authors on the federal commissions established to provide ethical guidelines for health care (CPHS, EAB, PCEMR)?
{ 1 } - Change in ethical and political attitudes in the United States may be discerned from the fact that although the first study group sought to develop a consensus founded upon natural law and shared religious beliefs, those sources of consensus are no longer acceptable.
{ 2 } - The fact that Congress recognizes the need for ethical norms in the field of research and therapy is a step forward.
{ 3 } - The norms formulated by the commissions are designed with our pluralistic society in mind and avoid controversy, so some of the more difficult and important ethical issues, such as when human life begins, are not considered.
{ 4 } - The basis on which the ethical statements are formulated is not the nature of the human person, physician-patient covenant, just society, or religious teaching, but what is culturally acceptable. Consequently, the conclusions are pragmatic and balance rights rather than defend them. Deciding ethical responsibilities in this manner is dangerous because it justifies whatever is popular.
{ 5 } - There is insufficient consideration of pressing ethical questions such as: Is there a right to equal health care for all and should all feasible care be financed publicly?
{ 6 } - Motivation for observing the norms of the federal commissions is not mainly monetary.
See p. 122.
<= back | menu | forward =>
5 is wrong. Please try again.
Which is NOT an observation by the authors on the federal commissions established to provide ethical guidelines for health care (CPHS, EAB, PCEMR)?
{ 1 } - Change in ethical and political attitudes in the United States may be discerned from the fact that although the first study group sought to develop a consensus founded upon natural law and shared religious beliefs, those sources of consensus are no longer acceptable.
{ 2 } - The fact that Congress recognizes the need for ethical norms in the field of research and therapy is a step forward.
{ 3 } - The norms formulated by the commissions are designed with our pluralistic society in mind and avoid controversy, so some of the more difficult and important ethical issues, such as when human life begins, are not considered.
{ 4 } - The basis on which the ethical statements are formulated is not the nature of the human person, physician-patient covenant, just society, or religious teaching, but what is culturally acceptable. Consequently, the conclusions are pragmatic and balance rights rather than defend them. Deciding ethical responsibilities in this manner is dangerous because it justifies whatever is popular.
{ 5 } - There is insufficient consideration of pressing ethical questions such as: Is there a right to equal health care for all and should all feasible care be financed publicly?
{ 6 } - Motivation for observing the norms of the federal commissions is not mainly monetary.
See p. 122.
<= back | menu | forward =>
6 is correct!
Which is NOT an observation by the authors on the federal commissions established to provide ethical guidelines for health care (CPHS, EAB, PCEMR)?
{ 1 } - Change in ethical and political attitudes in the United States may be discerned from the fact that although the first study group sought to develop a consensus founded upon natural law and shared religious beliefs, those sources of consensus are no longer acceptable.
{ 2 } - The fact that Congress recognizes the need for ethical norms in the field of research and therapy is a step forward.
{ 3 } - The norms formulated by the commissions are designed with our pluralistic society in mind and avoid controversy, so some of the more difficult and important ethical issues, such as when human life begins, are not considered.
{ 4 } - The basis on which the ethical statements are formulated is not the nature of the human person, physician-patient covenant, just society, or religious teaching, but what is culturally acceptable. Consequently, the conclusions are pragmatic and balance rights rather than defend them. Deciding ethical responsibilities in this manner is dangerous because it justifies whatever is popular.
{ 5 } - There is insufficient consideration of pressing ethical questions such as: Is there a right to equal health care for all and should all feasible care be financed publicly?
{ 6 } - Motivation for observing the norms of the federal commissions is not mainly monetary.
See p. 122.
<= back | menu | forward =>
Before continuing, you might try some wrong answers.
the end