What is your answer?
Which do the authors NOT suggest as a remedy for the malpractice problem?
{ 1 } - Paternalistic care of the public by the health care profession on the basis of its own expert judgment, combined with the profession's defense of itself against lay intrusion into health affairs.
{ 2 } - Physicians must give frank and honest testimony about colleagues' competence.
{ 3 } - The courts must not apply the "res ipsa loquitur" (the injury is sufficient evidence of fault) principle to most malpractice cases.
{ 4 } - There must be a satisfactory combination of peer discipline and consumer discipline of the medical profession.
{ 5 } - A more personalized practice of medicine that will reduce misunderstanding between professional and patient, combined with self-discipline of the health team.
{ 6 } - Fraternal correction of health care professionals, even by subordinates.
<= back | menu | forward =>
Directions: Click on a number from 1 to 6.
1 is correct!
Which do the authors NOT suggest as a remedy for the malpractice problem?
{ 1 } - Paternalistic care of the public by the health care profession on the basis of its own expert judgment, combined with the profession's defense of itself against lay intrusion into health affairs.
{ 2 } - Physicians must give frank and honest testimony about colleagues' competence.
{ 3 } - The courts must not apply the "res ipsa loquitur" (the injury is sufficient evidence of fault) principle to most malpractice cases.
{ 4 } - There must be a satisfactory combination of peer discipline and consumer discipline of the medical profession.
{ 5 } - A more personalized practice of medicine that will reduce misunderstanding between professional and patient, combined with self-discipline of the health team.
{ 6 } - Fraternal correction of health care professionals, even by subordinates.
See p. 105.
<= back | menu | forward =>
Before continuing, you might try some wrong answers.
2 is wrong. Please try again.
Which do the authors NOT suggest as a remedy for the malpractice problem?
{ 1 } - Paternalistic care of the public by the health care profession on the basis of its own expert judgment, combined with the profession's defense of itself against lay intrusion into health affairs.
{ 2 } - Physicians must give frank and honest testimony about colleagues' competence.
{ 3 } - The courts must not apply the "res ipsa loquitur" (the injury is sufficient evidence of fault) principle to most malpractice cases.
{ 4 } - There must be a satisfactory combination of peer discipline and consumer discipline of the medical profession.
{ 5 } - A more personalized practice of medicine that will reduce misunderstanding between professional and patient, combined with self-discipline of the health team.
{ 6 } - Fraternal correction of health care professionals, even by subordinates.
See p. 105.
<= back | menu | forward =>
3 is wrong. Please try again.
Which do the authors NOT suggest as a remedy for the malpractice problem?
{ 1 } - Paternalistic care of the public by the health care profession on the basis of its own expert judgment, combined with the profession's defense of itself against lay intrusion into health affairs.
{ 2 } - Physicians must give frank and honest testimony about colleagues' competence.
{ 3 } - The courts must not apply the "res ipsa loquitur" (the injury is sufficient evidence of fault) principle to most malpractice cases.
{ 4 } - There must be a satisfactory combination of peer discipline and consumer discipline of the medical profession.
{ 5 } - A more personalized practice of medicine that will reduce misunderstanding between professional and patient, combined with self-discipline of the health team.
{ 6 } - Fraternal correction of health care professionals, even by subordinates.
Proper practice of the physician does not guarantee success in producing health, nor always avoid some injury to the patient. See pp. 104-105.
<= back | menu | forward =>
4 is wrong. Please try again.
Which do the authors NOT suggest as a remedy for the malpractice problem?
{ 1 } - Paternalistic care of the public by the health care profession on the basis of its own expert judgment, combined with the profession's defense of itself against lay intrusion into health affairs.
{ 2 } - Physicians must give frank and honest testimony about colleagues' competence.
{ 3 } - The courts must not apply the "res ipsa loquitur" (the injury is sufficient evidence of fault) principle to most malpractice cases.
{ 4 } - There must be a satisfactory combination of peer discipline and consumer discipline of the medical profession.
{ 5 } - A more personalized practice of medicine that will reduce misunderstanding between professional and patient, combined with self-discipline of the health team.
{ 6 } - Fraternal correction of health care professionals, even by subordinates.
See p. 105.
<= back | menu | forward =>
5 is wrong. Please try again.
Which do the authors NOT suggest as a remedy for the malpractice problem?
{ 1 } - Paternalistic care of the public by the health care profession on the basis of its own expert judgment, combined with the profession's defense of itself against lay intrusion into health affairs.
{ 2 } - Physicians must give frank and honest testimony about colleagues' competence.
{ 3 } - The courts must not apply the "res ipsa loquitur" (the injury is sufficient evidence of fault) principle to most malpractice cases.
{ 4 } - There must be a satisfactory combination of peer discipline and consumer discipline of the medical profession.
{ 5 } - A more personalized practice of medicine that will reduce misunderstanding between professional and patient, combined with self-discipline of the health team.
{ 6 } - Fraternal correction of health care professionals, even by subordinates.
See p. 106.
<= back | menu | forward =>
6 is wrong. Please try again.
Which do the authors NOT suggest as a remedy for the malpractice problem?
{ 1 } - Paternalistic care of the public by the health care profession on the basis of its own expert judgment, combined with the profession's defense of itself against lay intrusion into health affairs.
{ 2 } - Physicians must give frank and honest testimony about colleagues' competence.
{ 3 } - The courts must not apply the "res ipsa loquitur" (the injury is sufficient evidence of fault) principle to most malpractice cases.
{ 4 } - There must be a satisfactory combination of peer discipline and consumer discipline of the medical profession.
{ 5 } - A more personalized practice of medicine that will reduce misunderstanding between professional and patient, combined with self-discipline of the health team.
{ 6 } - Fraternal correction of health care professionals, even by subordinates.
See p. 106.
<= back | menu | forward =>
the end