What is your answer?

Which is NOT a reason why the authors believe that testing for the AIDS virus without explicit informed consent is unethical?

    { 1 } - Testing for AIDS is not a routine medical procedure.
    { 2 } - Testing for AIDS is not necessary for public health.
    { 3 } - Knowledge by health care professionals of which patients have AIDS is in itself not sufficient to protect the health care professionals against it.
    { 4 } - Discrimination and opprobrium that may follow AIDS testing are severe.

<= back | menu | forward =>
Directions: Click on a number from 1 to 4.
























 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

























1 is wrong. Please try again.

Which is NOT a reason why the authors believe that testing for the AIDS virus without explicit informed consent is unethical?

See p. 61.

<= back | menu | forward =>
























 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

























2 is correct!

Which is NOT a reason why the authors believe that testing for the AIDS virus without explicit informed consent is unethical?

    { 1 } - Testing for AIDS is not a routine medical procedure.
    { 2 } - Testing for AIDS is not necessary for public health.
    { 3 } - Knowledge by health care professionals of which patients have AIDS is in itself not sufficient to protect the health care professionals against it.
    { 4 } - Discrimination and opprobrium that may follow AIDS testing are severe.

The authors think that such testing should be done to keep an account of and prevent the spread of the disease, and is thus necessary for public health, but they think the testing should be voluntary and anonymous.

<= back | menu | forward =>
Before continuing, you might try some wrong answers.
























 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

























3 is wrong. Please try again.

Which is NOT a reason why the authors believe that testing for the AIDS virus without explicit informed consent is unethical?

    { 1 } - Testing for AIDS is not a routine medical procedure.
    { 2 } - Testing for AIDS is not necessary for public health.
    { 3 } - Knowledge by health care professionals of which patients have AIDS is in itself not sufficient to protect the health care professionals against it.
    { 4 } - Discrimination and opprobrium that may follow AIDS testing are severe.

See p. 61.

<= back | menu | forward =>
























 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

























4 is wrong. Please try again.

Which is NOT a reason why the authors believe that testing for the AIDS virus without explicit informed consent is unethical?

    { 1 } - Testing for AIDS is not a routine medical procedure.
    { 2 } - Testing for AIDS is not necessary for public health.
    { 3 } - Knowledge by health care professionals of which patients have AIDS is in itself not sufficient to protect the health care professionals against it.
    { 4 } - Discrimination and opprobrium that may follow AIDS testing are severe.

See p. 61.

<= back | menu | forward =>
























 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

























the end