What is the best match?
Metaethics
{ 1 } - endorses and defends principles about how we ought to live.
{ 2 } - looks for general principles such as "It is always wrong to intend to violate someone's need."
{ 3 } - endorses and defends views about the nature and methodology of moral judgments.
{ 4 } - looks for specific principles such as "It is always wrong to sexually abuse another person."
{ 5 } - what the thing is considered as the source of its operations.
<= back | menu | forward =>
Directions: Click on a number from 1 to 5.
1 is wrong. Please try again.
Metaethics
{ 1 } - endorses and defends principles about how we ought to live.
{ 2 } - looks for general principles such as "It is always wrong to intend to violate someone's need."
{ 3 } - endorses and defends views about the nature and methodology of moral judgments.
{ 4 } - looks for specific principles such as "It is always wrong to sexually abuse another person."
{ 5 } - what the thing is considered as the source of its operations.
Normative Ethics <=> endorses and defends principles about how we ought to live.
<= back | menu | forward =>
2 is wrong. Please try again.
Metaethics
{ 1 } - endorses and defends principles about how we ought to live.
{ 2 } - looks for general principles such as "It is always wrong to intend to violate someone's need."
{ 3 } - endorses and defends views about the nature and methodology of moral judgments.
{ 4 } - looks for specific principles such as "It is always wrong to sexually abuse another person."
{ 5 } - what the thing is considered as the source of its operations.
Normative Ethical Theory <=> looks for general principles such as "It is always wrong to intend to violate someone's need."
<= back | menu | forward =>
3 is correct!
Metaethics
{ 1 } - endorses and defends principles about how we ought to live.
{ 2 } - looks for general principles such as "It is always wrong to intend to violate someone's need."
{ 3 } - endorses and defends views about the nature and methodology of moral judgments.
{ 4 } - looks for specific principles such as "It is always wrong to sexually abuse another person."
{ 5 } - what the thing is considered as the source of its operations.
Metaethics <=> endorses and defends views about the nature and methodology of moral judgments.
<= back | menu | forward =>
Before continuing, you might try some wrong answers.
4 is wrong. Please try again.
Metaethics
{ 1 } - endorses and defends principles about how we ought to live.
{ 2 } - looks for general principles such as "It is always wrong to intend to violate someone's need."
{ 3 } - endorses and defends views about the nature and methodology of moral judgments.
{ 4 } - looks for specific principles such as "It is always wrong to sexually abuse another person."
{ 5 } - what the thing is considered as the source of its operations.
Applied Ethics <=> looks for specific principles such as "It is always wrong to sexually abuse another person."
<= back | menu | forward =>
5 is wrong. Please try again.
Metaethics
{ 1 } - endorses and defends principles about how we ought to live.
{ 2 } - looks for general principles such as "It is always wrong to intend to violate someone's need."
{ 3 } - endorses and defends views about the nature and methodology of moral judgments.
{ 4 } - looks for specific principles such as "It is always wrong to sexually abuse another person."
{ 5 } - what the thing is considered as the source of its operations.
The nature of something <=> what the thing is considered as the source of its operations.
<= back | menu | forward =>
the end