What is the best match?
Metaethics
{ 1 } - looks for general principles such as "It is always wrong to intend to violate someone's need."
{ 2 } - considering whether it is a moral judgment to judge that it is better to have beef than chicken for dinner.
{ 3 } - looks for specific principles such as "It is always wrong to sexually abuse another person."
{ 4 } - a process for obtaining an object.
{ 5 } - endorses and defends principles about how we ought to live.
<= back | menu | forward =>
Directions: Click on a number from 1 to 5.
1 is wrong. Please try again.
Metaethics
{ 1 } - looks for general principles such as "It is always wrong to intend to violate someone's need."
{ 2 } - considering whether it is a moral judgment to judge that it is better to have beef than chicken for dinner.
{ 3 } - looks for specific principles such as "It is always wrong to sexually abuse another person."
{ 4 } - a process for obtaining an object.
{ 5 } - endorses and defends principles about how we ought to live.
Normative Ethical Theory <=> looks for general principles such as "It is always wrong to intend to violate someone's need."
<= back | menu | forward =>
2 is correct!
Metaethics
{ 1 } - looks for general principles such as "It is always wrong to intend to violate someone's need."
{ 2 } - considering whether it is a moral judgment to judge that it is better to have beef than chicken for dinner.
{ 3 } - looks for specific principles such as "It is always wrong to sexually abuse another person."
{ 4 } - a process for obtaining an object.
{ 5 } - endorses and defends principles about how we ought to live.
Metaethics <=> considering whether it is a moral judgment to judge that it is better to have beef than chicken for dinner.
<= back | menu | forward =>
Before continuing, you might try some wrong answers.
3 is wrong. Please try again.
Metaethics
{ 1 } - looks for general principles such as "It is always wrong to intend to violate someone's need."
{ 2 } - considering whether it is a moral judgment to judge that it is better to have beef than chicken for dinner.
{ 3 } - looks for specific principles such as "It is always wrong to sexually abuse another person."
{ 4 } - a process for obtaining an object.
{ 5 } - endorses and defends principles about how we ought to live.
Applied Ethics <=> looks for specific principles such as "It is always wrong to sexually abuse another person."
<= back | menu | forward =>
4 is wrong. Please try again.
Metaethics
{ 1 } - looks for general principles such as "It is always wrong to intend to violate someone's need."
{ 2 } - considering whether it is a moral judgment to judge that it is better to have beef than chicken for dinner.
{ 3 } - looks for specific principles such as "It is always wrong to sexually abuse another person."
{ 4 } - a process for obtaining an object.
{ 5 } - endorses and defends principles about how we ought to live.
A method <=> a process for obtaining an object.
<= back | menu | forward =>
5 is wrong. Please try again.
Metaethics
{ 1 } - looks for general principles such as "It is always wrong to intend to violate someone's need."
{ 2 } - considering whether it is a moral judgment to judge that it is better to have beef than chicken for dinner.
{ 3 } - looks for specific principles such as "It is always wrong to sexually abuse another person."
{ 4 } - a process for obtaining an object.
{ 5 } - endorses and defends principles about how we ought to live.
Normative Ethics <=> endorses and defends principles about how we ought to live.
<= back | menu | forward =>
the end