What is your answer?
The pseudo-argument called Irrelevancy:
{ 1 } - has a premise that is identified with the conclusion.
{ 2 } - has at least one premise that has nothing to do with implying the conclusion.
{ 3 } - is not a fallacy.
{ 4 } - cannot have all true premises.
{ 5 } - has premises that are inferred from the conclusion.
<= back | menu | forward =>
Directions: Click on a number from 1 to 5.
1 is wrong. Please try again.
The pseudo-argument called Irrelevancy:
{ 1 } - has a premise that is identified with the conclusion.
{ 2 } - has at least one premise that has nothing to do with implying the conclusion.
{ 3 } - is not a fallacy.
{ 4 } - cannot have all true premises.
{ 5 } - has premises that are inferred from the conclusion.
No, that would be Begging the Question.
<= back | menu | forward =>
2 is correct!
The pseudo-argument called Irrelevancy:
{ 1 } - has a premise that is identified with the conclusion.
{ 2 } - has at least one premise that has nothing to do with implying the conclusion.
{ 3 } - is not a fallacy.
{ 4 } - cannot have all true premises.
{ 5 } - has premises that are inferred from the conclusion.
<= back | menu | forward =>
Before continuing, you might try some wrong answers.
3 is wrong. Please try again.
The pseudo-argument called Irrelevancy:
{ 1 } - has a premise that is identified with the conclusion.
{ 2 } - has at least one premise that has nothing to do with implying the conclusion.
{ 3 } - is not a fallacy.
{ 4 } - cannot have all true premises.
{ 5 } - has premises that are inferred from the conclusion.
Yes, it is, because at least one of its premises is not involved in implying the conclusion.
<= back | menu | forward =>
4 is wrong. Please try again.
The pseudo-argument called Irrelevancy:
{ 1 } - has a premise that is identified with the conclusion.
{ 2 } - has at least one premise that has nothing to do with implying the conclusion.
{ 3 } - is not a fallacy.
{ 4 } - cannot have all true premises.
{ 5 } - has premises that are inferred from the conclusion.
Yes, it can; its problem is not false premises but invalid inference from them to the conclusion.
<= back | menu | forward =>
5 is wrong. Please try again.
The pseudo-argument called Irrelevancy:
{ 1 } - has a premise that is identified with the conclusion.
{ 2 } - has at least one premise that has nothing to do with implying the conclusion.
{ 3 } - is not a fallacy.
{ 4 } - cannot have all true premises.
{ 5 } - has premises that are inferred from the conclusion.
No, that would be the fallacy of Vicious Circle.
<= back | menu | forward =>
the end