What is your answer?
The conclusion in Aquinas' first way of proving God's existence that "This everyone understands to be God" refers to:
{ 1 } - an uncreated creator.
{ 2 } - a material substance.
{ 3 } - a sensible being.
{ 4 } - anything that can cause substantial change.
{ 5 } - anything that can cause accidental change.
<= back | menu | forward =>
Directions: Click on a number from 1 to 5.
1 is correct!
The conclusion in Aquinas' first way of proving God's existence that "This everyone understands to be God" refers to:
{ 1 } - an uncreated creator.
{ 2 } - a material substance.
{ 3 } - a sensible being.
{ 4 } - anything that can cause substantial change.
{ 5 } - anything that can cause accidental change.
This is the traditional Western definition of God.
<= back | menu | forward =>
Before continuing, you might try some wrong answers.
2 is wrong. Please try again.
The conclusion in Aquinas' first way of proving God's existence that "This everyone understands to be God" refers to:
{ 1 } - an uncreated creator.
{ 2 } - a material substance.
{ 3 } - a sensible being.
{ 4 } - anything that can cause substantial change.
{ 5 } - anything that can cause accidental change.
God, being unlimited, cannot be a material being.
<= back | menu | forward =>
3 is wrong. Please try again.
The conclusion in Aquinas' first way of proving God's existence that "This everyone understands to be God" refers to:
{ 1 } - an uncreated creator.
{ 2 } - a material substance.
{ 3 } - a sensible being.
{ 4 } - anything that can cause substantial change.
{ 5 } - anything that can cause accidental change.
God, being unlimited, cannot be a sensible being.
<= back | menu | forward =>
4 is wrong. Please try again.
The conclusion in Aquinas' first way of proving God's existence that "This everyone understands to be God" refers to:
{ 1 } - an uncreated creator.
{ 2 } - a material substance.
{ 3 } - a sensible being.
{ 4 } - anything that can cause substantial change.
{ 5 } - anything that can cause accidental change.
No, parents can generate, cause substantial change, but they are not God.
<= back | menu | forward =>
5 is wrong. Please try again.
The conclusion in Aquinas' first way of proving God's existence that "This everyone understands to be God" refers to:
{ 1 } - an uncreated creator.
{ 2 } - a material substance.
{ 3 } - a sensible being.
{ 4 } - anything that can cause substantial change.
{ 5 } - anything that can cause accidental change.
No, finite beings can cause accidental change.
<= back | menu | forward =>
the end