What is your answer?
Thomas Aquinas' first way of proving the existence of God:
{ 1 } - is an a priori argument.
{ 2 } - argues from change detectable by the senses to the existence of God.
{ 3 } - argues from an order in efficient causes to the existence of God.
{ 4 } - argues from order in the world to the existence of God.
{ 5 } - argues from the idea of God to the existence of God.
<= back | menu | forward =>
Directions: Click on a number from 1 to 5.
1 is wrong. Please try again.
Thomas Aquinas' first way of proving the existence of God:
{ 1 } - is an a priori argument.
{ 2 } - argues from change detectable by the senses to the existence of God.
{ 3 } - argues from an order in efficient causes to the existence of God.
{ 4 } - argues from order in the world to the existence of God.
{ 5 } - argues from the idea of God to the existence of God.
No, it is a posteriori because it argues from effect to cause.
<= back | menu | forward =>
2 is correct!
Thomas Aquinas' first way of proving the existence of God:
{ 1 } - is an a priori argument.
{ 2 } - argues from change detectable by the senses to the existence of God.
{ 3 } - argues from an order in efficient causes to the existence of God.
{ 4 } - argues from order in the world to the existence of God.
{ 5 } - argues from the idea of God to the existence of God.
<= back | menu | forward =>
Before continuing, you might try some wrong answers.
3 is wrong. Please try again.
Thomas Aquinas' first way of proving the existence of God:
{ 1 } - is an a priori argument.
{ 2 } - argues from change detectable by the senses to the existence of God.
{ 3 } - argues from an order in efficient causes to the existence of God.
{ 4 } - argues from order in the world to the existence of God.
{ 5 } - argues from the idea of God to the existence of God.
No, that is his second way.
<= back | menu | forward =>
4 is wrong. Please try again.
Thomas Aquinas' first way of proving the existence of God:
{ 1 } - is an a priori argument.
{ 2 } - argues from change detectable by the senses to the existence of God.
{ 3 } - argues from an order in efficient causes to the existence of God.
{ 4 } - argues from order in the world to the existence of God.
{ 5 } - argues from the idea of God to the existence of God.
No, that is his fifth way.
<= back | menu | forward =>
5 is wrong. Please try again.
Thomas Aquinas' first way of proving the existence of God:
{ 1 } - is an a priori argument.
{ 2 } - argues from change detectable by the senses to the existence of God.
{ 3 } - argues from an order in efficient causes to the existence of God.
{ 4 } - argues from order in the world to the existence of God.
{ 5 } - argues from the idea of God to the existence of God.
No, that is an ontological proof.
<= back | menu | forward =>
the end