What is your answer?


For Aristotle, the predicate vegetable, when said about a carrot, would be:

    { 1 } - secondary substance.
    { 2 } - the category of state.
    { 3 } - primary substance.
    { 4 } - the category of quality.
    { 5 } - the category of relation.

<= back | menu | forward =>
Directions: Click on a number from 1 to 5.
























 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

























1 is correct!


For Aristotle, the predicate vegetable, when said about a carrot, would be:

"Vegetable" is the category which defines the carrot, and is thus its secondary substance.

<= back | menu | forward =>
Before continuing, you might try some wrong answers.
























 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

























2 is wrong. Please try again.


For Aristotle, the predicate vegetable, when said about a carrot, would be:

    { 1 } - secondary substance.
    { 2 } - the category of state.
    { 3 } - primary substance.
    { 4 } - the category of quality.
    { 5 } - the category of relation.

"Vegetable" is not what the carrot has.

<= back | menu | forward =>
























 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

























3 is wrong. Please try again.


For Aristotle, the predicate vegetable, when said about a carrot, would be:

    { 1 } - secondary substance.
    { 2 } - the category of state.
    { 3 } - primary substance.
    { 4 } - the category of quality.
    { 5 } - the category of relation.

"Vegetable" is not an individual being in the statement "The carrot is a vegetable." It is the species of the carrot.

<= back | menu | forward =>
























 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

























4 is wrong. Please try again.


For Aristotle, the predicate vegetable, when said about a carrot, would be:

    { 1 } - secondary substance.
    { 2 } - the category of state.
    { 3 } - primary substance.
    { 4 } - the category of quality.
    { 5 } - the category of relation.

"Vegetable" is not a non-essential characteristic that tells what kind of being the carrot is in itself.

<= back | menu | forward =>
























 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

























5 is wrong. Please try again.


For Aristotle, the predicate vegetable, when said about a carrot, would be:

    { 1 } - secondary substance.
    { 2 } - the category of state.
    { 3 } - primary substance.
    { 4 } - the category of quality.
    { 5 } - the category of relation.

"Vegetable" is not the connection of the carrot to another being.

<= back | menu | forward =>
























 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

























the end